Green Justification and Environmental Movements

Abstract

This chapter discusses the contribution of the economics and sociology of conventions (EC/SC) to the study of environmental movements. The first section briefly reviews how EC/SC has contributed to a renewal in the study of collective action by relating it to processes of social construction of public problems. An examination of how actors succeed in turning their "private troubles" into "public issues" reveals that the observable diversity of environmental movements can be explained by the diversity of ways in which (1) material dependencies matter to people and (2) people try to have these concerns legitimized. As illustrated by the debates on "green justification", some arguments on the value of the environment relativize the political weight of the notion of justifiable social order in favor of the notions of ecosystem and biosphere and consequently challenge the "grammar of justification". Ecological arguments can also highlight the importance of "familiar attachments" as a specific source of emplaced valuations. In contrast to reductive frameworks (e.g. the NIMBY, "not in my backyard", syndrome), EC/SC takes into account not only how actors try to manage orders of worth, interest-based valuations, and familiar attachments in arguments about the value of the environment but also how they succeed or fail in having them recognized as publicly relevant. The final section discusses how EC/SC enables comparative and historical analyses of environmental movements, conflicts, and controversies and how it helps to shed light on the transformation of critique in an increasingly interconnected but still diverse world.

The Ordering of Green Values

“…cations in contemporary public conflicts. Nevertheless, our understanding of modes of ecological justifications is also profoundly influenced by the empirical work of Thévenot and Lamont (2000) or Thévenot Moody, and Lafaye (2000) and linked research (see the comprehensive discussion in Centemeri [2022] for a most recent contribution).…”

“…As our main concern is public debate, not concrete local regulation, we will not enter the broader field of economies of the convention (see Diaz-Bone 2018). For an up-to-date discussion of research on green justification within the economies of convention field, see Centemeri [2022]).…”

Representing personal and common futures: Insights and new connections between the theory of social representations and the pragmatic sociology of engagements

“…This emancipated representation will only stick (Breakwell, 2014) and become hegemonic, then, by compromising, in radically different ways and via reality tests, with other orders of worth. Indeed, a creative new compromise between the domestic and green orders of worth seems to be at the core of a new representation of an ecological society, as shown for example in the transnational permaculture movement -based on representations of community and care -and other prefigurative, exploratory engagements such as those relating to the notion of degrowth and "the commons" (Centemeri, 2022;Centemeri & Asara, 2022). We thus contend that any such new and creative recombination of orders of worth in the context of a specific dispute or struggle against a hegemonic representation emerges in the wake of a polemical representation.…”