2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
396
1
29

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(436 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
10
396
1
29
Order By: Relevance
“…In undertaking a literature review, we found that the most common techniques used in the evaluation of green marketing were questionnaires, observations and interviews. Questionnaire researches (Rivera-Camino, 2007;Abzari et al, 2013;Chan, 2013;Ko et al, 2013;Richey et al, 2014;Majerova, 2015;Nadanyiova et al, 2015;Singh, Kumar, 2015;Yadav et al, 2016;Papadas et al, 2017), and observations (Ham, Lee, 2011) are common for the evaluation of green marketing. These evaluations are grounded on data collected from organizations or their customers.…”
Section: Methodological Framework For the Evaluation Of Green Marketimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In undertaking a literature review, we found that the most common techniques used in the evaluation of green marketing were questionnaires, observations and interviews. Questionnaire researches (Rivera-Camino, 2007;Abzari et al, 2013;Chan, 2013;Ko et al, 2013;Richey et al, 2014;Majerova, 2015;Nadanyiova et al, 2015;Singh, Kumar, 2015;Yadav et al, 2016;Papadas et al, 2017), and observations (Ham, Lee, 2011) are common for the evaluation of green marketing. These evaluations are grounded on data collected from organizations or their customers.…”
Section: Methodological Framework For the Evaluation Of Green Marketimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review and analysis of the research in the field of green marketing has revealed a large variety of scales for the measurement of green marketing. Out of the ten measurement scales that were explored in this research (Chan, 2013;Fraj et al, 2013;Ko et al, 2013;Richey et al, 2014;D'Souza et al, 2015;Yadav et al, 2016;Papadas et al, 2017;Duffett et al, 2018;Chen, Yang, 2019;Dzulkarnain et al, 2019), three were one-dimensional tools for the measurement of green marketing performance (Fraj et al, 2013;Richey et al, 2014;Duffett et al, 2018). Scholars also proposed multidimensional tools to measure green marketing performance (Chan, 2013;Ko et al, 2013;D'Souza et al, 2015;Yadav et al, 2016;Papadas et al, 2017;Chen, Yang, 2019;Dzulkarnain et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodological Framework For the Evaluation Of Green Marketimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wu et al [26] emphasized that most enterprises sacrifice environmental and social investments to maintain economic growth. Adopting an organization management system (C2), exploring green marketing (C5), and increasing research and development investments (C6) may assist SMEs in addressing this issue [40,44,45]. Moreover, employing solid waste reduction (C10), adopting an environmental management system (C11) and decreasing natural resource consumption (C12) can also add value to the production process by eliminating negative environmental impacts and promoting sustainable environmental practices [46][47][48].…”
Section: Proposed Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of building a brand on values related to environmental and social performance is linked to three factors, specifically, the image of the green mark, the fulfillment of the expectation of green promises, and credibility. It follows that the green mark meets the criteria "3E", namely, it is ecological (minimizes negative environmental impacts), is transparent (does not support unfair practices and social injustice), and is economic (supports long-term economic sustainable development) [25].…”
Section: Brand In Green Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%