2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enmm.2017.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green synthesis with enhanced magnetization and life cycle assessment of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2) and for maintaining extraction processes temperature (Eq. 3) 32 . The inventory considers the 2014 Romanian electricity mix, which features the following primary sources: 26.38% coal, 11.64% gas, 18.23% nuclear, 31.71% hydro, 9.76% wind power, 1.57% where, Qa is the energy required for heating (kWh), Qm is the energy for maintaining required temperature, (kWh), m is the mass of heated fluid, kg, Cp is the specific heat, (kW/kg K), hc is the global heat transfer coefficient, (W/m 2 K), A is the heated surface area, T is the temperature difference (degrees).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) and for maintaining extraction processes temperature (Eq. 3) 32 . The inventory considers the 2014 Romanian electricity mix, which features the following primary sources: 26.38% coal, 11.64% gas, 18.23% nuclear, 31.71% hydro, 9.76% wind power, 1.57% where, Qa is the energy required for heating (kWh), Qm is the energy for maintaining required temperature, (kWh), m is the mass of heated fluid, kg, Cp is the specific heat, (kW/kg K), hc is the global heat transfer coefficient, (W/m 2 K), A is the heated surface area, T is the temperature difference (degrees).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ) and for maintaining extraction processes temperature (Eq. 3 ) 32 . The inventory considers the 2014 Romanian electricity mix, which features the following primary sources: 26.38% coal, 11.64% gas, 18.23% nuclear, 31.71% hydro, 9.76% wind power, 1.57% solar, 0.65% biomass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have reported the use of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi and algae (Kaul et al, 2012;Subramaniyam et al, 2015), ionic liquids and eutectic solvents (Sanchez et al, 2018), bio-and agrowaste (Nisticò et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2018;Olajire et al, 2017a,b), plant materials such as leaves, fruit (Kumar et al, 2014;Mohan Kumar et al, 2013) and seed (Radini et al, 2018;Venkateswarlu et al, 2014), T microwave heating (Alvarez-romero et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2017;Kombaiah et al, 2018a), and biodegradable polymers as greener routes for the synthesis of various nanoparticles. Other green-based methods for green synthesis of iron nanoparticles reported include amino acids (Marimón-Bolívar and González, 2018), vitamins, enzymes and waste (Wei et al, 2016a). Energy use, cost, environmental friendliness and availability are important considerations in adopting a greener technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, endemic plants offer a sustainable and functional alternative to obtain nanomaterials [21][22][23]. On the other hand, it is well known that in recent years the use of plants as reducing agents (Myzus persicae, Ceratonia silique, Calotropis gigantean, Thymus kotschyanus leaf extract and pisumsativum peels) during the chemical synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles has been widely reported [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. However, the diversity of plants, properties and compounds present in each species is very wide and whose interaction in the synthesis process is reflected in the properties of the nanomaterials obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%