2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green tea consumption and risk for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the liver fibrosis score was not directly reported or reported in ranges, we estimated the midpoint of each category by averaging the lower and upper boundaries of that category [ 24 , 25 ]. If the highest or lowest class was open-ended, we assumed that the open-ended interval length was the same as the adjacent interval [ 26 ]. In this study, the OR and HR were equally treated as RR according to our previous articles [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the liver fibrosis score was not directly reported or reported in ranges, we estimated the midpoint of each category by averaging the lower and upper boundaries of that category [ 24 , 25 ]. If the highest or lowest class was open-ended, we assumed that the open-ended interval length was the same as the adjacent interval [ 26 ]. In this study, the OR and HR were equally treated as RR according to our previous articles [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria included ( Sung et al, 2021 ) studies that involved patients who had irregular diet ( Zhao et al, 2021 ); research on associations between irregular diet and the risk of EC ( Pan et al, 2019 ); hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR), standardized incidence/hospitalization ratio (SIR/SHR), incidence rate ratio (IRR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in the study were reported or could be calculated; and ( Xie et al, 2020 ) case control studies or cohort studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exclusion criteria included ( Sung et al, 2021 ) reviews and comments ( Zhao et al, 2021 ); no HR, OR, IRR, or SIR/SHR provided ( Pan et al, 2019 ); study investigated relationships between irregular diet and cancer, but not EC specifically; and ( Xie et al, 2020 ) the study investigated relationships between dietary habits and cancer, but did not include irregular diet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the subgroup analysis, the OR was 0.79 in women (95% CI = 0.68-0.91). Therefore, green tea has a protective effect in women [59].…”
Section: Epidemiological Studies On the Anticancer Effects Of Green Teamentioning
confidence: 98%