2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse gas emission prediction on road network using deep sequence learning

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even when spatial resolution was increased, temporal dimension was not captured at a disaggregated level as in Grote et al (2018), in which five minute updating interval was employed. In terms of predictors used, generally fuel and economical factors were employed (Alfaseeh, Tu, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Even when spatial resolution was increased, temporal dimension was not captured at a disaggregated level as in Grote et al (2018), in which five minute updating interval was employed. In terms of predictors used, generally fuel and economical factors were employed (Alfaseeh, Tu, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the observation i being tested for cluster m, c m is the centroid of cluster m. The number of clusters is dependent on the data and a statistical analysis associated. To specify the optimal number of clusters, the elbow method/sum of squared error (Poucin, Farooq, and Patterson, 2018), which estimates the sum of squared distances between the points within a cluster was the guide (Alfaseeh, Tu, et al, 2020). Figure 6.2b…”
Section: Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations