2017
DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2017.3.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse gas penalty and incentive policies for a joint economic lot size model with industrial and transport emissions

Abstract: This paper presents a joint economic lot size model for a single manufacturer-a single buyer. The purposed model involves the greenhouse gas emission from industrial and transport sectors. We divide the emission into two types, namely the direct and indirect emissions. In this paper, we consider the Government's penalty and incentive policies to reduce the emission. We assume that the demand of the buyer is normally distributed and partially backordered. The objective is to minimize joint total cost incurred b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of the literature review is presented in Table 1. Yes Bazan et al [26] Yes Yes Zanoni et al [21] Yes Yes Zanoni et al [34] Yes Lee and Kim [25] Yes Yes Sarkar et al [37] Yes Sarkar et al [27] Yes Chan et al [31] Yes Wangsa [38] Yes Tiwari et al [10] Yes Yes Daryanto et al [11] Yes Yes Daryanto et al [41] Yes Marchi et al [46] Yes Yes Yes Bai et al [12] Yes Yes Yes Kumar and Uthayakumar [15] Yes Yes Wee and Daryanto [42] Yes Hasan et al [45] Yes Turken et al [16] Yes Yes Daryanto and Wee [44] Yes Yes This study Yes Yes Yes Yes…”
Section: Low-carbon Supply Chain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A summary of the literature review is presented in Table 1. Yes Bazan et al [26] Yes Yes Zanoni et al [21] Yes Yes Zanoni et al [34] Yes Lee and Kim [25] Yes Yes Sarkar et al [37] Yes Sarkar et al [27] Yes Chan et al [31] Yes Wangsa [38] Yes Tiwari et al [10] Yes Yes Daryanto et al [11] Yes Yes Daryanto et al [41] Yes Marchi et al [46] Yes Yes Yes Bai et al [12] Yes Yes Yes Kumar and Uthayakumar [15] Yes Yes Wee and Daryanto [42] Yes Hasan et al [45] Yes Turken et al [16] Yes Yes Daryanto and Wee [44] Yes Yes This study Yes Yes Yes Yes…”
Section: Low-carbon Supply Chain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarkar et al [37] use both fixed and variable transportation costs and emissions in a three-level supply chain. Wangsa [38] considers carbon emissions from production, transportation, and material handling activities. Focusing on the supply chain for cold products, Hariga et al [9] studied the cost savings and emissions reductions of an integrated supply chain model.…”
Section: Low-carbon Supply Chain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2020) also investigated the impact of different carbon policies, namely carbon cap-and-trade, limited CEs and carbon tax, on inventory decisions (Wangsa, 2017). Saga et al (2019) incorporated penalty and incentive policies to cut down the emissions from a supply chain system made of a vendor and a buyer.…”
Section: Carbon Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al. (2020) also investigated the impact of different carbon policies, namely carbon cap-and-trade, limited CEs and carbon tax, on inventory decisions (Wangsa, 2017). Saga et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others also attempted to combine two indicators such as fuel consumption and emissions in developing a new model (Wangsa, 2017;Wangsa et al, 2020). It was discovered that only Jauhari (2022) considered fuel, emissions, and electricity costs simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%