2020
DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GreenLight Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: One Laser for Different Prostate Sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current guidelines consider greenlight laser as an alternative to TURP in men with moderate-to-severe LUTS and a prostate volume of 30-80 mL, in light of their comparable short-and mid-term results [3,7] . Moreover, some evidence is emerging supporting the use of greenlight laser also for large volume prostates and in men on anticoagulation or with high cardiovascular risk [8][9][10][11] . According to the current literature, the major limitation of greenlight is the absence of long-term follow-up (≥ 36 months) data to evaluate the outcome, the rate of re-intervention, and patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current guidelines consider greenlight laser as an alternative to TURP in men with moderate-to-severe LUTS and a prostate volume of 30-80 mL, in light of their comparable short-and mid-term results [3,7] . Moreover, some evidence is emerging supporting the use of greenlight laser also for large volume prostates and in men on anticoagulation or with high cardiovascular risk [8][9][10][11] . According to the current literature, the major limitation of greenlight is the absence of long-term follow-up (≥ 36 months) data to evaluate the outcome, the rate of re-intervention, and patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%