Colloquial and Literary Latin 2010
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511763267.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greeting and farewell expressions as evidence for colloquial language: between literary and epigraphical texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, detailed diachronic and synchronic descriptions of Greek and Latin forms of address (Dickey 1995;1996;2002;2004a;2004b;Brown 2003; have been offered, suggesting a relation between these usages and the relative social standings of the speakers in interaction. Secondly, behaviour in conversation rituals, e.g., greetings and farewells (Ferri 2008;Poccetti 2010) and the use of formulaic expressions such as 'yes', 'no', and 'please' (Krylová 2004;Ferri 2010;Dickey 2012) have been investigated, although in Latin only. Thirdly, some attention has been devoted to diachronic realizations of individual classes of speech acts, e.g., directives (Risselada 1993;Leiwo 2010;Denizot 2011), or individual types of face-threatening acts, e.g., insults (Lentini 2013).…”
Section: Politeness In Greek and Latin Literature: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, detailed diachronic and synchronic descriptions of Greek and Latin forms of address (Dickey 1995;1996;2002;2004a;2004b;Brown 2003; have been offered, suggesting a relation between these usages and the relative social standings of the speakers in interaction. Secondly, behaviour in conversation rituals, e.g., greetings and farewells (Ferri 2008;Poccetti 2010) and the use of formulaic expressions such as 'yes', 'no', and 'please' (Krylová 2004;Ferri 2010;Dickey 2012) have been investigated, although in Latin only. Thirdly, some attention has been devoted to diachronic realizations of individual classes of speech acts, e.g., directives (Risselada 1993;Leiwo 2010;Denizot 2011), or individual types of face-threatening acts, e.g., insults (Lentini 2013).…”
Section: Politeness In Greek and Latin Literature: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agamennone invece si rifiuta di avallare questo sacrificio umano: questo l'antefatto della lite che Seneca rappresenta nelle fasi iniziali della tragedia 5 . È proprio in questo modo che Pirro ed Agamennone entrano in scena 6 ; i due potrebbero essersi incontrati ed aver iniziato a parlare in precedenza 7 , cominciando l'interazione nel modo che è stato ricostruito come consueto per il latino (Hofmann 1983;Ferri 2008;Roesch 2008;Poccetti 2010). Trattandosi di una lite però, è anche possibile che l'inizio di conversazione non sia quello usuale in cui i parlanti innanzitutto si salutano, poi indugiano più o meno brevemente in small talks ed infine entrano nel merito della conversazione (Berger 2016).…”
unclassified