2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grey-scale contrast enhancement in rabbit liver with SonoVue™ at different doses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of a previous study, SonoVue at 0.1 mL/kg BW was the optimal dose for rabbit liver flow perfusion. 13 As shown in our experiment, low-MI gray scale imaging clearly delineated the dynamic enhancement of the liver parenchyma. After the UCA was injected, the liver parenchyma was enhanced and rapidly increased to the PSI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of a previous study, SonoVue at 0.1 mL/kg BW was the optimal dose for rabbit liver flow perfusion. 13 As shown in our experiment, low-MI gray scale imaging clearly delineated the dynamic enhancement of the liver parenchyma. After the UCA was injected, the liver parenchyma was enhanced and rapidly increased to the PSI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[10][11][12] A bubble nondestruction method with a very low mechanical index (MI) and high sensitivity for harmonics is likely to be the most suitable for perfusion and reperfusion studies. [13][14][15] With the use of the real-time low-MI mode, the time-intensity curve could be calculated more accurately because bubbles are not destroyed. 16,17 However, the data for parameters derived from the time-intensity curve may be related to the different position of perfusion quantification, and they have not yet been shown in detail to date.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Several other factors, such as technical scanning variables, contrast medium characteristics, injection technique, and patient-related factors can influence quantitative variables. 2,5,8,[43][44][45][46] Peak intensity values were lower in comparison to those reported by others. 8 The use of different contrast media and different imaging system implies a different number of circulating microbubbles and, as a consequence, a different backscatter response from the tissue that influences the degree of contrast enhancement.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…5,44,46 Because of these reasons, quantitative values obtained from different protocols are not entirely comparable. 2,5,8,[43][44][45][46] Fasting for at least 12 h before contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the bowel is suggested to minimize the presence of gas and food particles 26 that create strong interference during the activation of the contrast-specific software. Furthermore, fasting is recommended to reduce the peristaltic activity 26 to avoid motion artefact that limits quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%