“…This final selection resulted in 21 papers (ASQUER, 2011;BAUWENS, GOTCHEV and HOLSTENKAMP, 2016;CHERP, JEWELL and GOLDTHAU, 2011;GRITSENKO, 2018;GRUNDMANN and EHLERS, 2016;HELDEWEG, 2017aHELDEWEG, , 2017bHOLSTENKAMP, 2019;KELLY and GEYER, 2018;LAMMERS and HELDEWEG, 2019;HOPPE, 2018, 2019;LAMMERS and VASENEV, 2017;MÄRKER, VENGHAUS and HAKE, 2018;MELVILLE et al, 2018;MILCHRAM et al, 2019;SHAH and NILES, 2016;SPIJKERBOER et al, 2019;VERHOOG, GHORBANI and DIJKEMA, 2016; VAN DER WAAL, DAS and VAN DER SCHOOR, 2020;WOLSINK, 2020), which supported the adaptation of Ostrom's IAD framework proposed in this study. The selected documents were fully read to identify: i) Whether Ostrom's IAD was applied literally or adapted, and ii) How the IAD was adapted to analyze constitutional arenas (policy-making level), addressing agents and coalitions with heterogeneous interests and endowments.…”