2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75541-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GridNet with Automatic Shape Prior Registration for Automatic MRI Cardiac Segmentation

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a fully automatic MRI cardiac segmentation method based on a novel deep convolutional neural network (CNN) designed for the 2017 ACDC MICCAI challenge. The novelty of our network comes with its embedded shape prior and its loss function tailored to the cardiac anatomy. Our model includes a cardiac centerof-mass regression module which allows for an automatic shape prior registration. Also, since our method processes raw MR images without any manual preprocessing and/or image cropping,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model achieved good Dice accuracy of 0.91 ± 0.04, similar to those reported in the literature (5,(47)(48)(49). This was in spite of facing additional challenges compared to cardiac cine imaging, namely 1) lower spatial resolution, 2) lower and inconsistent SNR and blood-myocardium CNR, and 3) SNR and CNR differences between the control and labeled series.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The proposed model achieved good Dice accuracy of 0.91 ± 0.04, similar to those reported in the literature (5,(47)(48)(49). This was in spite of facing additional challenges compared to cardiac cine imaging, namely 1) lower spatial resolution, 2) lower and inconsistent SNR and blood-myocardium CNR, and 3) SNR and CNR differences between the control and labeled series.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The networks explored in this work are built on the UNet architecture, which has shown outstanding performance in various medical segmentation tasks . This network consists of a contracting and expanding path, the former collapsing an image down into a set of high‐level features and the latter using these features to construct a pixel‐wise segmentation mask.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The networks explored in this work are built on the UNet architecture, which has shown outstanding performance in various medical segmentation tasks. [41][42][43][44][45] This network consists of a contracting and expanding path, the former collapsing an image down into a set of high-level features and the latter using these features to construct a pixel-wise segmentation mask. The original architecture also proposed skip connections between layers at the same level in both paths, bypassing information from early feature maps to the deeper layers in the network.…”
Section: A Fully Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem, a number of works have attempted to introduce additional contextual information to guide 2D FCN. This contextual information can include shape priors learned from labels or multiview images (Zotti et al, 2017(Zotti et al, , 2019Chen et al, 2019b). Others extract spatial information from adjacent slices to assist the segmentation, using recurrent units (RNNs) or multi-slice networks (2.5D networks) (Poudel et al, 2016;Patravali et al, 2017;Du et al, 2019;Zheng et al, 2018).…”
Section: Ventricle Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LGE MR imaging enables the Table 2. Segmentation accuracy of state-of-the-art segmentation methods verified on the cardiac bi-ventricular segmentation challenge (ACDC) dataset All the methods were evaluated on the same test set (50 subjects 2D GridNet-MD with registered shape prior 0.938 0.894 0.910 Khened et al (2019) 2D Dense U-net with inception module 0.941 0.894 0.907 Baumgartner et al (2017) 2D U-net with cross entropy loss 0.937 0.897 0.908 Zotti et al (2017) 2D GridNet with registered shape prior 0.931 0.890 0.912 Jang et al (2017) 2D M-Net with weighted cross entropy loss 0.940 0.885 0.907 Painchaud et al (2019) FCN followed by an AE for shape correction 0.936 0.889 0.909 Wolterink et al (2017c) Multi-input 2D dilated FCN, segmenting paired ED and ES frames simultaneously 0.940 0.885 0.900 Patravali et al (2017) 2D U-net with a Dice loss 0.920 0.890 0.865 Rohé et al (2017) Multi-atlas based method combined with 3D CNN for registration 0.929 0.868 0.881 Tziritas and Grinias (2017) Level-set +markov random field (MRF); Non-deep learning method 0.907 0.798 0.803 Yang et al (2017c) 3D FCN with deep supervision 0.820 N/A 0.780…”
Section: Scar Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%