Grieving geographies, mourning waters: Life, death, and environmental gendered racialized struggles in Mexico

Abstract

Grieving geographies are spaces of complex collective loss due to multiple interconnected forms of violence. Engaging with critical race theory, feminist geography and anthropology, and political ecology, this paper explores the intersections of gender, race, and the environment in Mexico. Black and Indigenous women in the Coast of Oaxaca grieve for the lagoons that are dying in front of them due to governmental and neoliberal policies, but also for the loss of members of their communities due to violence. I argue that facing the slow death of their lagoons system, plus everyday forms of violence, Black and Indigenous women organize to defend life, livelihood, and the lagoons in their community. These women have created everyday practices of resistance and alternative economies based on care and solidarity. This article explores environmental racism in Latin America, specifically where mestizaje ideology was imposed, and the affective relationship between human and other‐than‐human beings.

Between Hope and Loss: Peruvian Women Activists’ Visual Contestations of Extractive-led Development

“…Furthermore, feminist development scholars have particularly emphasized the importance of paying attention to emotion, the body and the everyday, in understanding gendered inequalities (Harcourt, 2009), whilst recent decolonial feminist thinking from Latin America has been especially important in foregrounding embodied and emotional understandings of women’s relationships to territory and place (Rodríguez Castro, 2020; Rodríguez Aguilera, 2022; Zaragocin, 2019).…”

“…At the same time, the women’s photos and narratives present the everyday as a highly emotive signifier of their continued resistance to extractive-led forms of development, and the process of cataloguing the everyday itself becomes a form of hopeful resistance. Through the women’s commentaries, we see the ways in which they imbue their photos with meanings that give a particular resonance to everyday activities, reflecting strategies in other contexts, whereby women anti-mining activists frame mundane and everyday practices as an integral part of their repertoire of resistance to large-scale resource extraction (Jenkins, 2017; Rodríguez Aguilera, 2022).…”

“The pandemic came to teach us how to eat”: COVID‐19, mutual vulnerability, and native corn in Oaxaca

“…Working on the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa, Brown and Marí Sáez (2020) suggest that understanding relationality should not only entail studying "closeness," and explore the ways that the separations crisis necessitated made and remade forms of relatedness among their interlocutors. Reece (2021Reece ( , 2022, studying the HIV/AIDS crisis in Botswana, similarly suggests studying crisis through the relations it structures. For Reece (2022), crises dramatize relations, prompting reflection on how subjects relate to one another, and necessitate ongoing negotiation of conflicts.…”

“…National identity since the Mexican Revolution (1910–1920) has been characterized by a shifting relationship to an imagined pre‐Hispanic past. Although ideologies of national identity have frequently justified the displacement of Indigenous people, Indigeneity has been an important symbolic reservoir from which the Mexican state has strategically drawn—this is regularly done through the language of revivalism (Rodríguez‐Aguilera, 2022; Saldívar, 2011). Anthropologists have noted revivalist trends in various arenas of Mexican public life, such as in healthcare (Duncan 2017) and justice (Aragón Andrade, 2017).…”

A poetics of living rebellion: Sociocultural anthropology in 2021

“…In a moment when Black, Indigenous, queer, and other racialized and marginalized communities continue to rise in rebellion, both in intimate, everyday moments and hypervisible eruptions of collective struggle within and against the oppressive structures of colonialism, racial capitalism, and ecological devastation, we cannot allow ourselves to passively “let anthropology burn” (Jobson 2020). Rather, we must move through the “grieving geographies” (Rodríguez Aguilera 2021) and “wake work” (Sharpe, as referenced in Berry 2021) of the present, using the tools at our disposal as anthropologists to help set fire to its foundational categories.…”