1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80058-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grip Strength Testing Reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
139
2
9

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
139
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…For the statistical analysis we chose the best value of two scores. Hamilton et al did not find any difference between using the mean values or the best value to determine the grip strength score [28]. The interindividual differences of muscular strength are wide even in healthy people and differ depending on sex, age, height and weight [3,34,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the statistical analysis we chose the best value of two scores. Hamilton et al did not find any difference between using the mean values or the best value to determine the grip strength score [28]. The interindividual differences of muscular strength are wide even in healthy people and differ depending on sex, age, height and weight [3,34,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the patient's arm was based on American Society of Hand Therapists recommendations [12]. The patient sat while his or her shoulder was adducted and neutrally rotated with the elbow flexed at 90° and the forearm and wrist neutrally positioned.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um dos motivos para esta escolha é a alta validade e confiabilidade que este instrumento apresenta [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . 18,23,[27][28][29]31 .…”
Section: Mão Direitaunclassified
“…A literatura recomenda o uso do modelo hidráulico para a avaliação da força de preensão manual 21,22 . Vários estudos já reportaram alta confiabilidade e/ou validade deste tipo de dinamômetro [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] e, por isto, este modelo é considerado o "padrão ouro" 27,29 e já foi utilizado por vários pesquisadores como um instrumento padrão para validar outros equipamentos de medida da força de preensão manual 18,23,[26][27][28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified