1989
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198907000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groin Flap Design and Versatility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some authors insist that a ray amputation is sometimes a better alternative, especially when the proximal interphalangeal joint is damaged, 12-15 most of the investigations contain enough evidence to support attempts to reconstruct these injuries. 13,16 Various methods have been developed for the coverage of such defects 3-8 ; however, the possibility of facilitating early motion is variable, and the quality of the flaps is quite different from that of a normal finger in most cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors insist that a ray amputation is sometimes a better alternative, especially when the proximal interphalangeal joint is damaged, 12-15 most of the investigations contain enough evidence to support attempts to reconstruct these injuries. 13,16 Various methods have been developed for the coverage of such defects 3-8 ; however, the possibility of facilitating early motion is variable, and the quality of the flaps is quite different from that of a normal finger in most cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pedicled groin flap has long been accepted as a safe, easy and reliable option for the reconstruction of soft tissue defects (11). Because of these qualities, the pedicled flap remains widely used despite the current trend toward free tissue transfer flaps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This flap provides a large amount of soft tissue, commonly described as 10 Â 20 cm, and provides excellent coverage for large soft tissue defects of the dorsum of the hand. 18 This flap offers the advantage of a conspicuous donor site, which can often be closed primarily if the width is kept to less than 10 cm. A recent large review of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap demonstrated it to be one of the thinnest options available with a thickness of 3 to 7 mm (average, 5 mm).…”
Section: Distant Pedicled Flaps Groin Flapmentioning
confidence: 99%