Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grooved Pegboard Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the neuropsychological assessment occurred after treadmill testing, the participant was allowed at least 1 hour of recovery before beginning neuropsychological testing. The neurocognitive domains assessed included: intelligence (Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence [WASI‐II]), academic skills (Woodcock‐Johnson III Test of Achievement), attention (Connor's Continuous Performance Test II, Trail Making Test [TMT] part A), memory (California Verbal Learning Test II, Visual Selective Reminding, WASI‐III [digit span forward]), processing speed (Grooved Pegboard Test, WAIS‐III [symbol search and digit symbol coding]), and executive function (TMT part B, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, WAIS‐III [digit span backward]). In addition, survivors completed a self‐rating questionnaire (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [adult version]), to evaluate perceived neurobehavioral function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the neuropsychological assessment occurred after treadmill testing, the participant was allowed at least 1 hour of recovery before beginning neuropsychological testing. The neurocognitive domains assessed included: intelligence (Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence [WASI‐II]), academic skills (Woodcock‐Johnson III Test of Achievement), attention (Connor's Continuous Performance Test II, Trail Making Test [TMT] part A), memory (California Verbal Learning Test II, Visual Selective Reminding, WASI‐III [digit span forward]), processing speed (Grooved Pegboard Test, WAIS‐III [symbol search and digit symbol coding]), and executive function (TMT part B, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, WAIS‐III [digit span backward]). In addition, survivors completed a self‐rating questionnaire (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [adult version]), to evaluate perceived neurobehavioral function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For impact on neurocognition including safety and efficacy, TAND domains were measured by well‐validated, standardized, assessment tools that used direct testing and parent/caregiver report rating scales. Global intellectual ability was assessed using the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI); language using the Expressive Vocabulary Test 2 (EVT2) and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 4 (PPVT4); learning and memory using Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning 2 (WRAML2); attention using CANTAB and WRAML2; executive function using CANTAB; and processing speed using CANTAB and grooved pegboard . Parent rating scales included the Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales‐II (VABS2); Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), Behavior Assessment System for Children 2 (BASC2), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual dexterity was subsequently assessed via the grooved pegboard test, indirect and direct zigzag tracking tests, and the 3Dconnexion proficiency test . Validated dexterity tests were selected based on their perceived relevance to basic laparoscopic surgery skills.…”
Section: Manual Dexterity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%