Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grooved Pegboard Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants were right-handed, as determined by a modified Edinburgh Inventory [ 30 ]. The nondominant hand was evaluated using grip dynamometry (i.e., maximal grip strength), Purdue Grooved Pegboard (i.e., dexterity) [ 31 ], and Semmes monofilaments [ 32 ] tests to characterize sensory function, respectively. Participants also completed the Short-Form Geriatric Depression Scale [ 33 ] and Katz Activities of Daily Living questionnaire [ 34 ] to measure for depressive symptoms and ability to independently complete motor tasks at home, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants were right-handed, as determined by a modified Edinburgh Inventory [ 30 ]. The nondominant hand was evaluated using grip dynamometry (i.e., maximal grip strength), Purdue Grooved Pegboard (i.e., dexterity) [ 31 ], and Semmes monofilaments [ 32 ] tests to characterize sensory function, respectively. Participants also completed the Short-Form Geriatric Depression Scale [ 33 ] and Katz Activities of Daily Living questionnaire [ 34 ] to measure for depressive symptoms and ability to independently complete motor tasks at home, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria also included any self-reported history of major neurological (e.g., stroke, seizure, traumatic brain injury) or psychiatric (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia) disorder. To ensure intact sensorimotor function, grip strength (Jamar hand dynamometer, [19]), functional dexterity (Grooved Pegboard, Lafayette Instruments, [20]), and tactile sensation (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, [21]) of both hands were collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (<28 was considered a deficit and, thus, did not meet criteria for SCA), Non-Dominant Grooved Pegboard Test (1 standard deviation [SD] above the age-specific mean was considered a deficit and, thus, did not meet criteria for SCA), and the Trail Making Test parts A ( ‡94 was considered a deficit and, thus, did not meet criteria for SCA) and B ( ‡282 was considered a deficit and, thus, did not meet criteria for SCA). [23][24][25]…”
Section: Neurocognitive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%