1979
DOI: 10.3354/meps001179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gross Excretion Rates of Natural Marine Phytoplankton and Heterotrophic Uptake of Excreted Products in the Southern North Sea, as Determined by Short-Term Kinetics

Abstract: Phytoplankton extracellular production has been determined kinetically during the spring phytoplankton bloom in three marine biotopes representative of the Southern North Sea (Scheldt estuary, Belgian coast and English Channel), differing greatly in their biological activities. Short-term kinetics of phytoplankton extracellular compounds produced during 14C incubations have been shown to increase our present capability for estimating gross phytoplankton extracellular production, if compared with a single measu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using Equation 10, excretion estimated from a 6 h incubation would range from 69 to 100 % of true among steady-state cultures (with error largest at low growth rates), and 59 to 54 % for the perturbed cultures. For a 2 h incubation, as sometimes suggested (Nalewajko et al, 1976;Lancelot, 1979), the corresponding estimates would be 32 to 100 % for steady-state, and 23 to 26 % for perturbed, cultures. These errors are much more substantial than those in production estimates, and pose a difficult problem for field measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using Equation 10, excretion estimated from a 6 h incubation would range from 69 to 100 % of true among steady-state cultures (with error largest at low growth rates), and 59 to 54 % for the perturbed cultures. For a 2 h incubation, as sometimes suggested (Nalewajko et al, 1976;Lancelot, 1979), the corresponding estimates would be 32 to 100 % for steady-state, and 23 to 26 % for perturbed, cultures. These errors are much more substantial than those in production estimates, and pose a difficult problem for field measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Such utilization can be rapid enough to influence apparent excretion rates after several hours of incubation (Nalewajko et al, 1976;Lancelot, 1979;Billen et al, 1980). It has generally been assumed that excreted carbon equilibrates so quickly with added tracer that underestimates due to tracer disequilibrium would not be an important problem in short incubat i o n~, and there is experimental support for this view (Wiebe and Smith, 1977;Wolter, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…light intensities as described before. Phytoplankton exudation rates were given by the initial slope of the kinetic curves (Lancelot, 1979). Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, samples were collected along a transect from eutrophic Belgian coastal waters to the more oligotrophic English Channel during a whole annual cycle The classical radiocarbon method for measuring primary production (Steeman-Nielsen, 1952) was adapted to measure gross production rate of extracellular organic compounds, as a function of incubation time (Lancelot, 1979). Different sets of short-term kinetics -in vitro, in sib, in semi-situ light intensitieswere performed in order to examine possible effects of light intensity.…”
Section: Collection Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation