2021
DOI: 10.1097/pep.0000000000000858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 & GMFM-88) User's Manual, 3rd Edition, Book Review

Abstract: The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) is the gold standard for measuring gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP) in both clinical and research settings. The GMFM User's Manual 3rd Edition with its companion GMFM App+ is now available. The GMFM has well-established psychometrics for children with CP younger than 15 years and is validated for use in other populations with motor impairment including Down syndrome and acquired brain injury. It is an evaluative tool, therefore used to measure ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This association is critical, as selective motor control is fundamental to executing precise and coordinated movements, particularly in tasks requiring fine motor skills. This correlation underscores the importance of incorporating balance training in therapeutic interventions for these children, aligning with previous studies that emphasize the role of balance in enhancing motor control and functional independence (21,27). Contrary to initial expectations, the study found no significant gender-based differences in selective motor control across various joints in the lower limbs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This association is critical, as selective motor control is fundamental to executing precise and coordinated movements, particularly in tasks requiring fine motor skills. This correlation underscores the importance of incorporating balance training in therapeutic interventions for these children, aligning with previous studies that emphasize the role of balance in enhancing motor control and functional independence (21,27). Contrary to initial expectations, the study found no significant gender-based differences in selective motor control across various joints in the lower limbs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…(3) Comparisons: conventional modern rehabilitation like physical therapy, occupational therapy, or speech therapy. (4) Outcome measures: primary outcome measures: ➀ Gross motor function measure (GMFM)-66 and GMFM-88 ( Te Velde and Morgan, 2022 ): measurement of motor function of decubitus position, turn-over, sitting position, creeping, and kneeling, erect position, walking, running, and jumping. ➁ Fine motor function measure: 2 subscales (grasping and visual-motor integration) of Peabody Development Motor Scales-II ( Fay et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GMFM comprises five major testing sub-items: (A) lying and rolling; (B) sitting; (C) crawling and kneeling; (D) standing; and (E) walking, running, and jumping. The scoring system ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates ‘no initiation’, 1 indicates ‘initiation’, 2 indicates ‘partial completion’, and 3 indicates ‘completion’ [ 14 ]. The intra- and inter-tester reliability for GMFM are well established, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.96 and 0.97, respectively [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%