2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00172-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gross nitrogen transformations in harvested and mature aspen-conifer mixed forest soils from the Boreal Plain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies on gross N turnover in high-latitude forest and tundra ecosystems have shown that NH 4 + production seldom exceeds gross N consumption (all processes consuming NH 4 + ) (e.g., Davidson et al 1992;Fisk et al 1998;Fisk and Fahey 2001;Perakis and Hedin 2001;Carmosini et al 2002;Booth et al 2005). This was also found here in the DS and SH, but not in the TH forest type.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many studies on gross N turnover in high-latitude forest and tundra ecosystems have shown that NH 4 + production seldom exceeds gross N consumption (all processes consuming NH 4 + ) (e.g., Davidson et al 1992;Fisk et al 1998;Fisk and Fahey 2001;Perakis and Hedin 2001;Carmosini et al 2002;Booth et al 2005). This was also found here in the DS and SH, but not in the TH forest type.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The rates of gross N mineralization found in the three forest types (Table 3, Fig. 1) encompassed the variations within Arctic (Fisk et al 1998), temperate, and boreal soils worldwide (Merila¨et al 2002;Fisk and Fahey 2001;Carmosini et al 2002;Perakis and Hedin 2001;Davidson et al 1992;Booth et al 2005). Rates of gross nitrification in the TH forest type were among the higher reported (Booth et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, 15 years after harvest the uncut stands in this study had higher net mineralization rates than the harvested sites. Forest harvesting has increased, decreased or resulted in no change to forest floor and mineral soil horizon ammonification and nitrification rates when compared to unharvested boreal stands (Gordon and Van Cleve, 1983;Walley et al, 1996;Smith et al, 1998Smith et al, , 2000Simard et al, 2001;Carmosini et al, 2002Carmosini et al, , 2003. The results from these studies agree with the main conclusion of Grenon et al (2004) in their examination of forest floor N dynamics in coniferous ecosystems in British Columbia.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Measurements of tree harvesting effects on gross ammonification, gross nitrification and gross immobilization rates in mineral soils of forest ecosystems are scarce and mostly limited to measurements at single points in time in clear cut stands (Pedersen et al 1999;Carmosini et al 2002;Westbrook and Devito 2004). However, Grenon et al (2004), after finding temporal variability of temperature sensitivity of gross NH 4 + transformation in the forest floor of two clear cut sites, emphasized the necessity of multiple sampling dates for drawing conclusions on ecosystem functioning.…”
Section: Measurements and Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%