2008
DOI: 10.1080/01431160801942227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground‐based monitoring of high‐risk landslides through joint use of laser scanner and interferometric radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the potential capacity of the instruments is optimized (Lichti and Jamtsho, 2006;Teza et al, 2008a). In geological applications, laser scanner data are typically used to evaluate the geometry and kinematics of unstable masses (Teza et al, 2007(Teza et al, , 2008bOppikofer et al, 2009a,b), including volume calculations, or also to carry out remote geomechanical evaluations (Slob et al, 2005).…”
Section: Terrestrial and Airborne Laser Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the potential capacity of the instruments is optimized (Lichti and Jamtsho, 2006;Teza et al, 2008a). In geological applications, laser scanner data are typically used to evaluate the geometry and kinematics of unstable masses (Teza et al, 2007(Teza et al, , 2008bOppikofer et al, 2009a,b), including volume calculations, or also to carry out remote geomechanical evaluations (Slob et al, 2005).…”
Section: Terrestrial and Airborne Laser Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that other techniques such as ground-based synthetic aperture radar (GB-SAR), are also being widely used for the detection of sub-centimetric deformation across million cubic metre mass movements, large quarries and excavations (Antonello et al, 2004;Corsini et al, 2006;Noferini et al, 2007). The combined use of TLS and GB-SAR techniques providing subcentimetric deformation is discussed in Teza et al (2008), showing that the fine resolution of deformation detected by GB-SAR, in conjunction with high resolution of the slope topography obtained by TLS, may help understand actively deforming rock slopes more comprehensively. Yet the weaknesses of GB-SAR are the loss of coherence in the radar wavelength in the case of rapid changes between survey epochs (e.g.…”
Section: Benefits and Limitations Of The Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the weaknesses of GB-SAR are the loss of coherence in the radar wavelength in the case of rapid changes between survey epochs (e.g. rockfalls), a more complex set-up compared with TLS and a significantly lower spatial resolution, usually ranging from 1 to 100 square metres (Tarchi et al, 2005;Corsini et al, 2006;Teza et al, 2008;Derron et al, 2011).…”
Section: Benefits and Limitations Of The Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A promising technique is ground-based InSAR (GBSAR) (Monserrat et al 2014), which could allow high precisions in the detection of movements along the LOS (Teza et al 2007(Teza et al , 2008; Luzi et al 2006;Lingua et al 2008;Bozzano et al 2011). GBSAR, however, presents some limiting factors:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%