2020
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2020-119
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-based validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-5p TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> measurements with the NDACC ZSL-DOAS, MAX-DOAS and Pandonia global networks

Abstract: Abstract. This paper reports on consolidated ground-based validation results of the atmospheric NO2 data produced operationally since April 2018 by the TROPOMI instrument on board of the ESA/EU Copernicus Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5p) satellite. Tropospheric, stratospheric, and total NO2 column data from S5p are compared to correlative measurements collected from, respectively, 19 Multi-Axis DOAS (MAX-DOAS), 26 NDACC Zenith-Scattered-Light DOAS (ZSL-DOAS), and 25 PGN/Pandora instruments distributed global… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Validation studies (Judd et al, 2020;Tack et al, 2020;Verhoelst et al, 2020) show that the currently available TROPOMI product (versions 1.2.2 and 1.3.0) has tropospheric columns with effectively a typical systematic bias of about −15% (see Supporting Information), and we expect the derived emissions from these observations to be low by such an amount on average. In the relative comparisons discussed in this paper for both columns and emissions we expect a large part of such a multiplicative bias to cancel out.…”
Section: No 2 Observations By Tropomimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Validation studies (Judd et al, 2020;Tack et al, 2020;Verhoelst et al, 2020) show that the currently available TROPOMI product (versions 1.2.2 and 1.3.0) has tropospheric columns with effectively a typical systematic bias of about −15% (see Supporting Information), and we expect the derived emissions from these observations to be low by such an amount on average. In the relative comparisons discussed in this paper for both columns and emissions we expect a large part of such a multiplicative bias to cancel out.…”
Section: No 2 Observations By Tropomimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The tropospheric NO 2 VCD is the TROPOMI product used to evaluate the NO 2 reduction from space for the high variability of the pollutant occurring in the lower atmospheric layers, especially over urban sites taking advantage of the high spatial resolution (ground pixel at nadir 7 × 3.5 km 2 before August 6, 2019, and then 5.5 × 3.5 km 2 , as reported in Verhoelst et al 2020). The TROPOMI products are chosen in the central Italian region comprehensive of the urban and the surrounding rural areas (Fig.…”
Section: Tropomi Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description of the spatial-temporal variation of the NO 2 concentration includes the tropospheric NO 2 columnar content provided by the TROPOMI (TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument) sensor on board of Sentinel 5 Precursor (S5P) satellite (Veefkind et al 2012). In the framework of Copernicus program, the S5P was launched in October 2017 by European Space Agency (ESA) to monitor the density of several compounds (e.g., NO 2 , CO, O 3 , CH 4 , CH 2 O) and cloud distributions affecting air quality and climate with higher spatial resolution (ground pixel at nadir 7 × 3.5 km 2 before August 6, 2019, and then 5.5 × 3.5 km 2 , as reported in Verhoelst et al 2020) than the other remote sensing sensors such as Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) with a spatial resolution of 13 × 24 km 2 (Krotkov et al 2016;Levelt et al 2006). Previous studies considered TROPOMI for its high spatial resolution to monitor air pollutants at urban level (Ialongo et al 2020) and in remote areas with different types of industrial sources (Griffin et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitted trace gas absorption cross sections in the slant column spectral fit include NO 2 (Vandaele et al, 1998), O 4 (Thalman and Volkamer, 2013), water vapor (Rothman et al, 2009), CHOCHO (Volkamer et al, 2005 ± 0.1 × 10 15 molecules cm −2 . The differences in uncertainty between spectral fits are likely due to a minor amount of undersampling of the GeoTASO slit function, which has a slightly flattened top hat shape compared to the more purely Gaussian shape exhibited by GCAS.…”
Section: Airborne Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 99%