2007
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2007054-272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground cover by three crops cultivated on marginal lands in Southwestern Nigeria and implications for soil erosion

Abstract: Resource-poor farmers in developing nations cultivate marginal lands, thereby exacerbating the problem of soil degradation through poor plant growth and ground coverage. An assessment of ground cover under such a practice will provide a guideline for soil conservation. Ground cover by leguminous cover crops (e.g., Mucuna pruriens, Pueraria phaseoloides and Vigna unguiculata), associated with yam, maize and rice was measured in three different experiments in southwestern Nigeria using beaded-string method while… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such suitable land becomes scarce due to increasing land-use intensity driven by demographic pressure and dwindling land availability. Furthermore, inappropriately cultivated lands are exposed to erosion and soil degradation (Maduakor et al 1984;Carsky et al 2001;Salako et al 2007). Inconsistent results were obtained in studies on the efficiency and economics of inorganic fertilizer application to yam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such suitable land becomes scarce due to increasing land-use intensity driven by demographic pressure and dwindling land availability. Furthermore, inappropriately cultivated lands are exposed to erosion and soil degradation (Maduakor et al 1984;Carsky et al 2001;Salako et al 2007). Inconsistent results were obtained in studies on the efficiency and economics of inorganic fertilizer application to yam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a number of authors (Dickey et al, 1984;Lopes et al, 1987;Amado et al, 1989;Carvalho et al, 1990;McGregor et al, 1990, Schick et al, 2000, Salako et al, 2007 have described the benefits that crop covers provide to the soil when remaining on soil surface. These coverages decrease water and soil losses mainly because of the protection they provide against the detachment caused by raindrops; moreover, they constitute a physical barrier to runoff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent study cases include the estimation of plants light interception and canopy coverage in species such as cotton (Stewart et al 2007;Oshaughnessy et al 2008), maize (Sarlangue et al 2008), tomato (Campillo et al 2008), faba bean (Nasrullahzadeh et al 2007), and soybean (Purcell 2000), among others. The use of canopy coverage has been extended to other subjects such as a help to estimate the amount of spray solution intercepted by the plants (Becker et al 1999), as a measure to evaluate soil conservation practices (Salako et al 2007), and, in more general terms, as a complementing tool for precision agriculture (Rajan and Maas 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%