57th International Astronautical Congress 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.iac-06-c1.6.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Guided CX-OLEV Rendez-vous with Uncooperative Geostationary Satellite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further tests of robotic OOS scenarios included fuel and electronics transfer and deployment of and operations with a microsatellite. The Swedish Space Cooperation (SSC), together with Kayser-Threde, Germany, and Sener, Spain, is developing the SMART orbital life extension vehicle (SMART-OLEV) (Tarabini et al, 2007). It aims at extending the operational lifetime of geostationary satellites.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Oos Technology Demonstratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further tests of robotic OOS scenarios included fuel and electronics transfer and deployment of and operations with a microsatellite. The Swedish Space Cooperation (SSC), together with Kayser-Threde, Germany, and Sener, Spain, is developing the SMART orbital life extension vehicle (SMART-OLEV) (Tarabini et al, 2007). It aims at extending the operational lifetime of geostationary satellites.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Oos Technology Demonstratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical operational targets on orbit are cooperative in the sense that they allow friendly communication for synchronization manipulation, as well as dedicated grappling fixtures and artificial markers to support docking [4]. The capture process of cooperative spacecraft is almost static or quasi-static in low earth orbits, such as the famous CX-OLEV mission [5] and SMART-OLEV spacecraft [6]. Nowadays, the robotic arms with full driven have been widely applied to the tasks in space, such as docking, berthing, refueling, repairing and upgrading [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, SDRE has been used more extensively in optimizing the control of nonlinear systems (Abbaszadeh & Marquez, 2012;Aliyu, 2000;Amato, 2006;Amato, Colacino, Cosentino, & Merola, 2014;Amato, Cosentino, & Merola, 2010;Banks, Kwon, Toivanen, & Tran, 2006;Bernábe-Loranca, Coello-Coello, & Osorio-Lama, 2012;Bouzaouache & Braiek, 2008;Elloumi & Braiek, 2012;Mohan & Miller, 2008;Shamma & Cloutier, 2003;Strano & Terzo, 2015;Won & Biswas, 2007). The SDRE method can be used to control and stabilize a wide range of systems, such as satellites (Cyril, Jaar, & Misra, 1995;Flores-Abad & Ma, 2012;Inaba, Oda, & Asano, 2006;Tarabini et al, 2007), spacecraft (Kaiser, Sjöberg, Delcura, & Eilertsen, 2008;Xin & Pan, 2011), helicopter (Bogdanov CONTACT Mohammad Ali Nekoui manekoui@eetd.kntu.ac.ir et al, 2003;Dimitrov & Yoshida, 2004;Liu, Wu, & Lu, 2007;Yoshida, Dimitrov, & Nakanishi, 2006), robots (Abiko & Hirzinger, 2007;Huang, Wang, Meng, & Liu, 2015;Huang, Wang, Meng, Zhang, & Liu, 2016), chaotic system (Choi, 2012;Sinha, Henrichs, & Ravindra, 2000;Yuan, Liu, Lin, Hu, & Gong, 2017) and more. The problem of eliminating disturbance in control systems is one of the most important issues that has always been considered, and in case of inappropriate attention to it, it can cause large damage to the control system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%