2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Motion Duration Effects on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase in the number of inelastic cycles generated vertical cracks at an early stage of the test that culminated in lap splice failure. This result has direct implications in the design of retrofit measures for existing RC bridge columns since one would expect less capacity for columns subjected to subduction zone earthquakes and is consistent with the numerical case study and with previous experimental studies ( Takemura and Kawashima 1997) , (Kunnath et al 1997), (Ou et al 2013). Moreover, the result implies that the common assessment of existing bridges by doing pushover analyses might overestimate the actual strength and deformation capacity of RC bridge superstructures.…”
Section: Comparison Between Column Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This increase in the number of inelastic cycles generated vertical cracks at an early stage of the test that culminated in lap splice failure. This result has direct implications in the design of retrofit measures for existing RC bridge columns since one would expect less capacity for columns subjected to subduction zone earthquakes and is consistent with the numerical case study and with previous experimental studies ( Takemura and Kawashima 1997) , (Kunnath et al 1997), (Ou et al 2013). Moreover, the result implies that the common assessment of existing bridges by doing pushover analyses might overestimate the actual strength and deformation capacity of RC bridge superstructures.…”
Section: Comparison Between Column Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This result is consistent with experimental and numerical studies, e.g. Ibarra and Krawinkler (Ibarra and Krawinkler 2005b), Borg et al (Borg et al 2012), Ou et al (Ou et al 2013), Chandramohan, et al (Chandramohan et al 2013). In those studies were concluded that structural components' capacity and collapse are influenced by the duration of ground motion and the number of inelastic cycles.…”
Section: Numerical Case Studysupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the scarcity of available ground motions has been addressed by collecting and utilizing long duration ground motions recorded from recent large magnitude earthquakes, most notably the 2008 Wenchuan (China), 2010 Maule (Chile), and 2011 Tohoku (Japan) earthquakes. The second challenge of isolating the effect of duration from other ground motion characteristics has been previously addressed by Hancock and Bommer (2007), Montejo and Kowalsky (2008), and Ou et al (2014) by modifying the spectral content of recorded accelerograms to have similar response spectra. Sideras and Kramer (2012) used stochastically simulated accelerograms having similar amplitude and frequency characteristics, but different durations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foliente [14] extended the singleelement pinching model to allow the point of maximum pinching at any hysteretic restoring force level. Based on the test results of RC bridge columns, Ou et al [13] proposed to relate the pinching effect to the maximum displacement. Based on the test results of RC bridge columns, Ou et al [13] proposed to relate the pinching effect to the maximum displacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%