Power Line Radiation and Its Coupling to the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7063-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Observations of Power Line Radiation Coupled to the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fraser-Smith (1979, 1981 has speculated that the instability is suppressed by ''the radiation from electric power distribution system into the magnetosphere'' and this is likely the cause of the Pc1 weekend effect, but any concrete mechanism of such a suppression is not yet available. It is known that Thorne and Tsurutani (1979), Park et al (1983), Zaslavski (1996), Nunn et al (1999), Rodger et al (2000) and Ne˘mec et al (2006) have observed magnetospheric effects of the power line radiation, but how this radiation might induce the septan variation of the Pc1 wave activity remains a mystery. As one possible line of reasoning one may mention that the admixture of O + and/or He + ions in the magnetospheric plasma impedes the penetration of the Pc1 waves from the region of excitation towards the Earth (e.g., Guglielmi and Kangas, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fraser-Smith (1979, 1981 has speculated that the instability is suppressed by ''the radiation from electric power distribution system into the magnetosphere'' and this is likely the cause of the Pc1 weekend effect, but any concrete mechanism of such a suppression is not yet available. It is known that Thorne and Tsurutani (1979), Park et al (1983), Zaslavski (1996), Nunn et al (1999), Rodger et al (2000) and Ne˘mec et al (2006) have observed magnetospheric effects of the power line radiation, but how this radiation might induce the septan variation of the Pc1 wave activity remains a mystery. As one possible line of reasoning one may mention that the admixture of O + and/or He + ions in the magnetospheric plasma impedes the penetration of the Pc1 waves from the region of excitation towards the Earth (e.g., Guglielmi and Kangas, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Weak spectral lines with separations of 50 or 100 Hz were transmitted (Park and Chang, 1978;Park et al, 1983). Input wave intensities were only $0.1 pT, but strong lines were observed at Roberval with spectral broadening and triggered emissions.…”
Section: Nonlinear Eectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Excellent groundbased observations of PLHR have been obtained from the magnetically conjugate pair Siple, Antarctica and Roberval, Quebec. (Helliwell et al, 1975;Park and Helliwell, 1981;Park et al, 1983). These papers report a frequent occurrence of magnetospheric lines with separations $120 Hz.…”
Section: Observational History Of Plhrmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the intensity of the PLHR events is generally rather low, they may trigger new electromagnetic emissions [Park and Helliwell, 1983;Nunn et al, 1999;Parrot and Němec, 2009;Parrot et al, 2014] and possibly contribute to electron precipitation [Tatnall et al, 1983;Bullough, 1995;Prakash et al, 2009]. Propagation of PLHR events from their source power line up to the satellite altitudes was considered by Kikuchi [1983], Ando et al [2002], Němec et al [2008], and Jing et al [2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%