2005
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2004.833922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Resistance Measurement With Alternative Fall-of-Potential Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, when measuring the GPR of a grounding system, it is impossible to place the voltage electrode at infinity [ 25 ]. In the measurement of the fall-of-potential method [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], the position of the voltage electrode needs to be continuously adjusted. The position distribution of the voltage electrode and the current electrode in the test is shown in Figure 1 , which shows the commonly used arrangement when using the fall-of-potential method to measure the grounding resistance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, when measuring the GPR of a grounding system, it is impossible to place the voltage electrode at infinity [ 25 ]. In the measurement of the fall-of-potential method [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], the position of the voltage electrode needs to be continuously adjusted. The position distribution of the voltage electrode and the current electrode in the test is shown in Figure 1 , which shows the commonly used arrangement when using the fall-of-potential method to measure the grounding resistance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in actual wiring, long distance wiring is not possible. Three-pole compensation method was usually used in the grounding resistance detection, and it's principle is shown in Figure 1 [1][5] [6] . Using electric field intensity formula E Jρ = and potential equation…”
Section: Detection Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation for the proposed novel position for the potential probe was completed under different electrode length with 14 mm diameter. Equations (9), (10) and (13) are used to complete the simulation that is shown in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Fall Of Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi et al [9] nominated the separation between the tested grid and the current probe to be in the order of 2.37 times the dimension of the grid under test. The research in [10][11][12] covers the FOP method; however, there is no dimension in the papers to relate the grid size with the current lead length. The work in [13]i s based on current lead lengths of more than ten times the electrode length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation