2015 International Conference on 3D Vision 2015
DOI: 10.1109/3dv.2015.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Segmentation Based on Loopy Belief Propagation for Sparse 3D Point Clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the experiments we used the 60m limit by default (and the 30m limit in the time performance 4 http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org/ test). In order to make fair evaluation, we computed the accuracy of our method for both the maximal range set to 60m (same conditions as for [1]) and the unlimited range (to illustrate behavior for more distant measurements). Also, since the Zhang's method has no threshold/parameter for tuning the false positives to false negatives ratio, only a single precision/recall value can be computed instead of the whole PR curve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the experiments we used the 60m limit by default (and the 30m limit in the time performance 4 http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org/ test). In order to make fair evaluation, we computed the accuracy of our method for both the maximal range set to 60m (same conditions as for [1]) and the unlimited range (to illustrate behavior for more distant measurements). Also, since the Zhang's method has no threshold/parameter for tuning the false positives to false negatives ratio, only a single precision/recall value can be computed instead of the whole PR curve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared CNNs which were trained either by using the human-made annotations only (label human-only), or just automatically annotated dataset (automatic-only), or using both datasets together (label both). Moreover, we evaluated , precision, recall and the best F-score of the proposed networks compared to [1]. *The precision (and the recall) were estimated for points where recall (and precision respectively) is the same as the results of [1] (also displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, many studies have been conducted relating to it. 14,20 In this section, some existing studies are noted and are primarily grouped into two types.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the number of points in the seeds is smaller than minPts, then the current points can be regarded as noise and it should be denoted as noise point (Algorithm 2, lines [13][14]. Otherwise, a valid label is assigned to all points in the seeds and the current points (Algorithm 2, lines [15][16][17][18][19][20]. For every points in seeds, their k neighboring positions are also searched (Algorithm 2, line 21); if the number of neighboring points within ep from a given point in seeds is greater than minPts, those points will also be labeled with the same label (Algorithm 2, lines 26-37).…”
Section: Non-ground Object Clustering Processmentioning
confidence: 99%