2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.101.205122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-state properties of the Hubbard model in one and two dimensions from the Gutzwiller conjugate gradient minimization theory

Abstract: We introduce Gutzwiller conjugate gradient minimization (GCGM) theory, an ab initio quantum many-body theory for computing the ground-state properties of infinite systems. GCGM uses the Gutzwiller wave function but does not use the commonly adopted Gutzwiller approximation (GA), which is a major source of inaccuracy. Instead, the theory uses an approximation that is based on the occupation probability of the on-site configurations, rather than approximations that decouple the site-site correlations as used in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GCGM method generally yields results in reasonable agreement with the reference data, i.e., the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) [35][36][37], density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) [38,39], and density matrix embedding theory (DMET) [40,41] results provided in reference [42]. In reference [13], we also showcase several examples of the frustrated t − t Hubbard model (t stands for the 2nd nearest-neighbor hopping), where the GCGM method yields satisfying results compared with reference data. For conciseness, we do not show them in this review.…”
Section: The Hubbard Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The GCGM method generally yields results in reasonable agreement with the reference data, i.e., the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) [35][36][37], density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) [38,39], and density matrix embedding theory (DMET) [40,41] results provided in reference [42]. In reference [13], we also showcase several examples of the frustrated t − t Hubbard model (t stands for the 2nd nearest-neighbor hopping), where the GCGM method yields satisfying results compared with reference data. For conciseness, we do not show them in this review.…”
Section: The Hubbard Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At the weak correlation regime, i.e., U = 2, the GCGM results agree reasonably well with DMRG. However, when it comes to the strong correlation regime, i.e., U = 8, the GCGM results do not agree well with DMRG, especially when t is comparable to t. Despite this inaccuracy in the estimation of the spin correlation, the energy calculation is reasonably accurate, as shown in reference [13].…”
Section: The Hubbard Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations