2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-1074-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground truth data generation for skull–face overlay

Abstract: Objective and unbiased validation studies over a significant number of cases are required to get a more solid picture on craniofacial superimposition reliability. It will not be possible to compare the performance of existing and upcoming methods for craniofacial superimposition without a common forensic database available for the research community. Skull-face overlay is a key task within craniofacial superimposition that has a direct influence on the subsequent task devoted to evaluate the skull-face relatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, we plan to study other techniques to model the consistency between bony and facial shapes using similarity measures. Then, a degree of confidence for each of them can be obtained analyzing their performance over a ground truth dataset [41]. Multifactorial methods have been shown to produce better results than single indicators methods [25], so, the integration of these techniques can provide a most confident value to measure spatial relations between bony and facial shapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, we plan to study other techniques to model the consistency between bony and facial shapes using similarity measures. Then, a degree of confidence for each of them can be obtained analyzing their performance over a ground truth dataset [41]. Multifactorial methods have been shown to produce better results than single indicators methods [25], so, the integration of these techniques can provide a most confident value to measure spatial relations between bony and facial shapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 presents an overview of the ground truth data creation process. Detailed explanations of this process are given in [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instances were created as follows [26]: The subjects were submitted to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for clinical purposes. It generates precise 3D models (0.3 mm slices) in an orthostatic position and it thus avoids undesired gravitational effects on the soft tissue.…”
Section: A Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included the soft tissue depth measurements of specific studies [23]- [25] within the SFO task. We tested the performance of our approach on 18 SFO problem instances that belong to the first and unique ground truth dataset [26]. This allows us to evaluate our automatic SFO method following an unbiased and reliable procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%