1982
DOI: 10.3133/ofr802046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-water levels and water quality in an area near Topaz Lake, Douglas County, Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to chemical analyses presented by Harrill (1973) for Lemmon Valley, Nev., in most cases where nitrate concentrations were elevated, the Na-to-Cl ratio was less than 2:1. Nowlin (1982) investigated sources of nitrate contamination near Topaz Lake in Nevada and found that elevated concentrations of nitrate were associated with Na-to-Cl ratios in the range 0.9 to 1.7.…”
Section: Chemical Components Of Domestic Sewagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to chemical analyses presented by Harrill (1973) for Lemmon Valley, Nev., in most cases where nitrate concentrations were elevated, the Na-to-Cl ratio was less than 2:1. Nowlin (1982) investigated sources of nitrate contamination near Topaz Lake in Nevada and found that elevated concentrations of nitrate were associated with Na-to-Cl ratios in the range 0.9 to 1.7.…”
Section: Chemical Components Of Domestic Sewagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of the gravel-packed interval and the length of the annular space around the well casing that is backfilled with drill cuttings can be of higher permeability and can create a vertical connection between permeable zones that were previously isolated from one another by lowpermeability material. 244 316 161 80 3,060 338 262 271 174 280 127 146 234 288 203 180 153 348 82 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1976197819801982YEAR 198419861988 The decreasing step-trends in concentrations of chloride and dissolved solids for water samples from the west Carson Valley area suggest that data collected during the early time period (1969)(1970)(1971)(1972)(1973)(1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978) may not represent the same aquifers as data collected during the later time period (1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987). This is one of the potential problems of not using data collected from an established monitoring network.…”
Section: Detected Trends In Relation To Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground-water sampling by the USGS in Nevada has, for the most part, been done on a one-time basis in the course of areal Water-resources investigations. Repetitive sampling in a monitoring context has been done only at the Mohave Generating Station in the Colorado River Valley (table 11) Other USGS projects include three that involved documentation of the subsurface transport of contaminants: (1) An ev4luation of the effect of seepage from tailings ponds at Weed Heights in Lyon County (Seitz and others, 1982); (2) an investigation of the potential for transport of radioactive wastes in the unsaturated zone at the low-level Jadioactive-waste-disposal facility at Beatty in Nye County (Nichols, 1986) contamination by effluents from septic tanks at Topaz Lake 1982). Long-term monitoring is not a design function of any of these projects.…”
Section: Us Geological Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%