2016
DOI: 10.3386/w22484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grounded by Gravity: A Well-Behaved Trade Model with Industry-Level Economies of Scale

Abstract: Although economists have long been interested in the implications of Marshallian externalities (i.e., industry-level external economies of scale) for trading economies, the large number of equilibria that they typically imply has kept such externalities out of the recent quantitative trade literature. This paper presents a multi-industry trade model with industry-level economies of scale that nests a Ricardian model with Marshallian externalities as well as multi-industry versions of Krugman (1980} andMelitz (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 By properly defining markets, our specification allows for external economies of scale in a region-sector, as in Ethier (1982), and technology diffusion between regions, as in Fujita et al (1999) and Lucas and Rossi-Hansberg (2003). When markets are industry groups in a region, our environment accommodates differences across sectors in market structure and economies of scale -e.g., Krugman and Venables (1995), Balistreri et al (2010), Kucheryavyy et al (2016). In addition, the cross-market elasticity of labor productivity, ψ ij , may also incorporate congestion forces implied by the spatial re-allocation of other factors of production (see Online Appendix B).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 By properly defining markets, our specification allows for external economies of scale in a region-sector, as in Ethier (1982), and technology diffusion between regions, as in Fujita et al (1999) and Lucas and Rossi-Hansberg (2003). When markets are industry groups in a region, our environment accommodates differences across sectors in market structure and economies of scale -e.g., Krugman and Venables (1995), Balistreri et al (2010), Kucheryavyy et al (2016). In addition, the cross-market elasticity of labor productivity, ψ ij , may also incorporate congestion forces implied by the spatial re-allocation of other factors of production (see Online Appendix B).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Given this, the production structure of our model can be mapped into existing static models with scale effects that show existence and uniqueness of the equilibrium (e.g. Kucheryavyy et al (2016)). …”
Section: Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our simulations suggest that for our parameter values, there is a unique fixed point. Kucheryavyy, Lyn, and Rodríguez-Clare (2016) find that a sufficient condition for uniqueness is that the trade elasticity multiplied by the scale elasticity ( − ςθ in our notation) should be less than 1. Our estimates θ = 7.7 and ς = − 0.035 imply − ςθ = 0.27 ≪ 1 , suggesting a unique equilibrium.…”
Section: A Three Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Following the literature, z mℓ is distributed Fréchet with shape parameter θ . The final determinant of productivity is external economies of scale, a novel element in multinational production models, but recently incorporated in trade models by Kucheryavyy, Lyn, and Rodríguez-Clare (2016). As with that paper and the related empirical estimation carried out in Bartelme, Costinot, and Rodríguez-Clare (2018), productivity is specified as a power function of industry size in country ℓ .…”
Section: B Costs (Including Frictions)mentioning
confidence: 99%