“…As conventional inductors are physically bulky and large, they are not convenient to fabricate for assembling electronic systems 1 . For the design of active inductors, researchers have come up with a variety of active building blocks (ABBs), which have been prominently employed in the past for simulating the inductors that include current conveyor and its variants, 2–11 current feedback operational amplifiers (CFOAs), 12–18 inverting CFOA, 19 commercially available device LT1228, 20 four‐terminal floating nullors (FTFN), 21 four‐terminal floating nullors transconductance amplifiers (FTFNTA), 22 transconductance amplifier and its variants, 23–28 voltage differencing buffered amplifier (VDBA), 29–31 voltage differencing differential input buffered amplifier (VDDIBA), 32 voltage differencing inverting buffered amplifier (VDIBA), 33 voltage differencing gain amplifier (VDGA), 34 operational transresistance amplifier (OTRA), 35,36 second generation voltage conveyor (VCII), 37 voltage differencing differential difference amplifiers (VDDDA), 38 operational transconductance amplifiers (OTA), 39 voltage differencing current conveyors (VDCC), 40 controlled gain voltage differencing current conveyor (CG‐VDCC), 41 electronically controllable current conveyors (ECCIIs) and differential voltage buffer (DVB) 42 current differencing buffered amplifier (CDBA), 43–47 current controlled current differencing buffered amplifier (CCCDBA), 48,49 and many more. These reported inductance simulator circuits can be categorized in different ways: (i) lossy and lossless, (ii) grounded and floating, and (iii) series and parallel inductor simulators.…”