2019 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icsc45622.2019.8938336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grounded Series R-L impedance Simulator using CDDITA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As conventional inductors are physically bulky and large, they are not convenient to fabricate for assembling electronic systems. 1 For the design of active inductors, researchers have come up with a variety of active building blocks (ABBs), which have been prominently employed in the past for simulating the inductors that include current conveyor and its variants, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] current feedback operational amplifiers (CFOAs), [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] inverting CFOA, 19 commercially available device LT1228, 20 four-terminal floating nullors (FTFN), 21 four-terminal floating nullors transconductance amplifiers (FTFNTA), 22 transconductance amplifier and its variants, [23][24][25][26][27][28] voltage differencing buffered amplifier (VDBA), [29][30][31] voltage differencing differential input buffered amplifier (VDDIBA), 32 voltage differencing inverting buffered amplifier (VDIBA), 33 voltage differencing gain amplifier (VDGA), 34 operational transresistance amplifier (OTRA), 35,36 second generation voltage conveyor (VCII), 37 voltage differencing differential difference amplifiers (VDDDA), 38 operational transconductance amplifiers (OTA), 39 voltage differencing current conveyors (VDCC), 40 control...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As conventional inductors are physically bulky and large, they are not convenient to fabricate for assembling electronic systems. 1 For the design of active inductors, researchers have come up with a variety of active building blocks (ABBs), which have been prominently employed in the past for simulating the inductors that include current conveyor and its variants, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] current feedback operational amplifiers (CFOAs), [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] inverting CFOA, 19 commercially available device LT1228, 20 four-terminal floating nullors (FTFN), 21 four-terminal floating nullors transconductance amplifiers (FTFNTA), 22 transconductance amplifier and its variants, [23][24][25][26][27][28] voltage differencing buffered amplifier (VDBA), [29][30][31] voltage differencing differential input buffered amplifier (VDDIBA), 32 voltage differencing inverting buffered amplifier (VDIBA), 33 voltage differencing gain amplifier (VDGA), 34 operational transresistance amplifier (OTRA), 35,36 second generation voltage conveyor (VCII), 37 voltage differencing differential difference amplifiers (VDDDA), 38 operational transconductance amplifiers (OTA), 39 voltage differencing current conveyors (VDCC), 40 control...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As conventional inductors are physically bulky and large, they are not convenient to fabricate for assembling electronic systems 1 . For the design of active inductors, researchers have come up with a variety of active building blocks (ABBs), which have been prominently employed in the past for simulating the inductors that include current conveyor and its variants, 2–11 current feedback operational amplifiers (CFOAs), 12–18 inverting CFOA, 19 commercially available device LT1228, 20 four‐terminal floating nullors (FTFN), 21 four‐terminal floating nullors transconductance amplifiers (FTFNTA), 22 transconductance amplifier and its variants, 23–28 voltage differencing buffered amplifier (VDBA), 29–31 voltage differencing differential input buffered amplifier (VDDIBA), 32 voltage differencing inverting buffered amplifier (VDIBA), 33 voltage differencing gain amplifier (VDGA), 34 operational transresistance amplifier (OTRA), 35,36 second generation voltage conveyor (VCII), 37 voltage differencing differential difference amplifiers (VDDDA), 38 operational transconductance amplifiers (OTA), 39 voltage differencing current conveyors (VDCC), 40 controlled gain voltage differencing current conveyor (CG‐VDCC), 41 electronically controllable current conveyors (ECCIIs) and differential voltage buffer (DVB) 42 current differencing buffered amplifier (CDBA), 43–47 current controlled current differencing buffered amplifier (CCCDBA), 48,49 and many more. These reported inductance simulator circuits can be categorized in different ways: (i) lossy and lossless, (ii) grounded and floating, and (iii) series and parallel inductor simulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main problem of the low pass passive filter, usually, is the size and cost of the inductors, where the passive components (inductance, capacitive) is not suitable to design in a low pass filter for medical applications, additionally, the drawback of the passive inductor is a requirement of excessive chip area. In addition, passive inductors are vulnerable to process fluctuations and suffer from resistive losses [9]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher in [11] presented a circuit configuration that can act like a grounded impedance simulator/grounded impedance scaling circuit it can simulate electronically tunable grounded resistance/capacitance/inductance/FDNR and also work as a grounded impedance multiplier circuit, which can scale up/scale-down the value of arbitrary grounded impedance with an electronically controllable multiplication factor. In [12] described a grounded lossy inductance (grounded parallel RL network) simulator configuration employing two Current differencing differential input transconductance amplifiers (CDDITAs), one resistance (grounded), and one capacitance (grounded) is completely free from active/passive component matching conditions and its behavior is studied considering non-ideal current-voltage transfer ratios. To validate the usefulness of the presented parallel resistor inductance (RL) simulator some filter designs are developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%