Grounding Wellness: Coloniality, Placeism, Land, and a Critique of “Social” Determinants of Indigenous Mental Health in the Canadian Context

Abstract

Authored by a small team of settler and Indigenous researchers, all of whom are deeply involved in scholarship and activism interrogating ongoing processes of coloniality in lands now known to many as Canada, this paper critically examines “social” and grounded determinants of Indigenous mental health and wellness. After placing ourselves on the grounds from which we write, we begin by providing an overview of the social determinants of health (SDOH), a conceptual framework with deep roots in colonial Canada. Though important in pushing against biomedical framings of Indigenous health and wellness, we argue that the SDOH framework nevertheless risks re-entrenching deeply colonial ways of thinking about and providing health services for Indigenous people: SDOH, we suggest, do not ultimately reckon with ecological, environmental, place-based, or geographic determinants of health in colonial states that continue to occupy stolen land. These theoretical interrogations of SDOH provide an entry point to, first, an overview of Indigenous ways of understanding mental wellness as tethered to ecology and physical geography, and second, a collection of narrative articulations from across British Columbia: these sets of knowledge offer clear and unequivocal evidence, in the form of Indigenous voices and perspectives, about the direct link between land, place, and mental wellness (or a lack thereof). We conclude with suggestions for future research, policy, and health practice actions that move beyond the current SDOH model of Indigenous health to account for and address the grounded, land-based, and ecologically self-determining nature of Indigenous mental health and wellness.

The Conceptual Framework for the Therapeutic Approach used in Phase 3 Trials of MDMA-AT for PTSD

“…For clinicians working with MDMA-Assisted Therapy for PTSD, familiarity with these core concepts is important, as they directly informed the therapeutic approach that led to the impressive clinical outcomes on the Phase 3 trials. However, by naming a small group of clinicians and theoreticians whose work strongly influenced this therapeutic model, this paper may give the false impression of a direct theoretical lineage, idealizing and/or exaggerating the influence of a small number of individuals (generally from dominant social identities, within a largely individualistic biomedical model that centers physicians over the many other caregivers that sustain a community (126,127) at the expense of the many other influences that shaped the therapeutic framework and approach. As noted in Box 3, those influences were no less essential, and included not only the many others who have advanced-often without credit-psychedelic and psychotherapy research and practice, but the many intrapersonal, interpersonal, cultural, and social factors that shaped the investigators who developed the therapy model.…”

“…community-based support for collective healing and growth (127). Judith Herman (103) notes that "Trauma destroys the social systems of care, protection, and meaning that support human life.…”

Introductory Chapter: The Global Framework for Wellness – Concepts, Theories, Measurements, Interventions and New Directions

“…While there is a growing literature on the health of indigenous people and the deep interconnections that exist between the physical, spiritual, emotional and mental dimensions of health and well-being, [68][69][70], there must be a realization, that such concerns are not unique to indigenous populations. Wilson et al [71] have noted that indigenous peoples have gone from being relatively healthy and prosperous to living with inequitable social marginalization, racism and health disparities compared to those residing in their respective countries.…”

Ethical Relational Space: Autoethnographic Reflections on Learning From Indigenous Mothering

“…As a start, we can begin by questioning the assumptions, beliefs and values that guide the many settler childcare, education, health and social service spaces and institutions that Indigenous families interact with. We can also use whatever privilege and power we might have to support Indigenous families reconnecting with their lands and waters, acknowledging the power of land-based healing and cultural resurgence in the well-being and selfdetermination of Indigenous peoples (Alfred, 2023;Josewski et al, 2023).…”