2007
DOI: 10.1201/9781420009132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater Chemicals Desk Reference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
4
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[26] Using the relationship K d = ƒ oc × K oc , [131] this translates into an estimated log 10 K oc upper limit of <1.2 which agrees with our log 10 K oc estimates of 0.13 (SPARC K ow ), 0.24 (SPARC D octanol ), and -2.03 (ALOGPS). In a broader study of TFA sorption to 54 soils from North America and Europe, [132] log K oc values (calculated from the reported K d and ƒ om values using the formula K d = 0.58 × ƒ om × K oc [131] ) ranged from 0.25 to 1.77 (mean=median=1.12), in reasonable agreement with our SPARC K ow and D octanol estimates, the earlier work of van Dijk, [26] and field manipulation experiments in an experimental forest. [133] The ALOGPS approach appears to underestimate the K oc value for TFA.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…[26] Using the relationship K d = ƒ oc × K oc , [131] this translates into an estimated log 10 K oc upper limit of <1.2 which agrees with our log 10 K oc estimates of 0.13 (SPARC K ow ), 0.24 (SPARC D octanol ), and -2.03 (ALOGPS). In a broader study of TFA sorption to 54 soils from North America and Europe, [132] log K oc values (calculated from the reported K d and ƒ om values using the formula K d = 0.58 × ƒ om × K oc [131] ) ranged from 0.25 to 1.77 (mean=median=1.12), in reasonable agreement with our SPARC K ow and D octanol estimates, the earlier work of van Dijk, [26] and field manipulation experiments in an experimental forest. [133] The ALOGPS approach appears to underestimate the K oc value for TFA.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…There could be a slight rearrangement of the surfactant micelles with increasing pH, leading to slightly more sorption capacity for HOCs on the hydrophobic surfaces of Triton-X. Since acenaphthene has a very high pK a value (N15) (Montgomery, 2007), higher than the range of pH (4.0-10.0) considered in the current study, it is neutral within the pH range (Atkins and De Paula, 2002). …”
Section: Effect Of Ph On Simultaneous Removalmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Almost all samples for VOCs in the four shallow wells and all samples analyzed for heavy metals in the two sampled shallow wells were below detection limits. Only carbon disulfide, which can be found in some soil disinfectants, herbicides, and grain fumigants (Montgomery and Welkom, 1989), was detected at low concentrations in one well. The general absence of contaminants in groundwater near the nested wells indicates that few, if any, contaminants entered the groundwater system after flooding of homes and subsequent drawdown of the lake.…”
Section: Potential Groundwater Contamination From Flooding Of Residenmentioning
confidence: 96%