1993
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(93)90182-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater fluxes in the global hydrologic cycle: past, present and future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
102
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum current chemical weathering rate estimated from dissolved material originating from rock weathering in the 60 largest rivers on Earth is about 2.1 × 10 9 t∕y (67). This estimate does not incorporate weathering of basalts in arcs, where the chemical weathering rate is higher compared to the average continental silicate weathering rate (e.g., 68, 69); it also does not include the dissolved continental material lost via groundwater flow into the oceans, which may be as much as 50% of that contributed by rivers (70), although the overall flow of groundwater into the ocean is not likely to be more than 6% of the total continental runoff (71). Thus, this chemical weathering rate estimate is considered a minimum estimate.…”
Section: Model Predictions and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum current chemical weathering rate estimated from dissolved material originating from rock weathering in the 60 largest rivers on Earth is about 2.1 × 10 9 t∕y (67). This estimate does not incorporate weathering of basalts in arcs, where the chemical weathering rate is higher compared to the average continental silicate weathering rate (e.g., 68, 69); it also does not include the dissolved continental material lost via groundwater flow into the oceans, which may be as much as 50% of that contributed by rivers (70), although the overall flow of groundwater into the ocean is not likely to be more than 6% of the total continental runoff (71). Thus, this chemical weathering rate estimate is considered a minimum estimate.…”
Section: Model Predictions and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global water budget and integrated hydrologic-hydrogeological approaches suggest FSGD may account for 0.3 to 16% of the total freshwater discharge to oceans [Zektser and Loaiciga, 1993;Burnett et al, 2003]. FSGD is 11 highly variable at small and large scales, and depends on various geological, hydrological and climate factors.…”
Section: Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this has been investigated in a few studies [Robinson et al, 2006;Abarca et al, 2013], beach morphology changes may have important implications on the 47 biogeochemistry and transformations in a STE and requires further investigation as we seek to understand fully the transient behavior of this complex system.  While regional and global scale estimates of the magnitude and importance of SGD are available [e.g., Zektser and Loaiciga, 1993;Sawyer et al, 2016], improved quantification of the role of the STE and SGD in controlling nutrient, carbon, greenhouse gas and metal fluxes to the coastal ocean on global and ocean basin scales is needed. There have been limited attempts on measuring these fluxes over large scales other than Rodellas et al [2015] who provided estimates of nutrients fluxes into the Mediterranean Sea.…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps and Research Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the most noticeable impacts of climate change could be changes in surface-water levels and quality (Leith and Whitfield 1998;Winter 1983), there are potential effects on the quantity and quality of groundwater (Bear and Cheng 1999;Zektser and Loaiciga 1993).…”
Section: Rising Interest In Impacts Of Climate Change On Subsurface Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of approaches for obtaining the climate data series appears to have increased in recent years, ranging from the use of global averages (Loaiciga et al 1996;Zektser and Loaiciga 1993) to the use of regional "bulk" projections (Allen et al 2004;Brouyere et al 2004;Vaccaro 1992;Yusoff et al 2002) to the direct application of downscaled climate data (Jyrkama and Sykes 2007;Scibek and Allen 2006b;Scibek et al 2007;Serrat-Capdevila et al 2007;Toews and Allen 2009) to the use of regional climate models (Rivard et al 2008;van Roosmalen et al 2007van Roosmalen et al , 2009). Some of the early efforts to assess potential hydrologic impacts were reviewed by Gleik (1986).…”
Section: Downscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%