2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2006.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater ingress to tunnels – The exact analytical solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The drawdown and the lateral extent of this depression depend on the depth of the tunnel below the initial water table and on aquifer hydraulic characteristics. A wide range of methods has been proposed to predict both groundwater inflow to tunnels and the drawdown caused by the tunnel such as analytical solutions for different hydrogeological settings (Goodman et al 1965;Kolymbas and Wagner 2007;Marechal and Perrochet 2003;Perrochet 2005), including solutions for transient flow towards tunnels drilled into heterogeneous formations (Perrochet and Dematteis 2007) or tunnels in multi-layer aquifer systems (Yang and Yeh 2007), as well as different numerical models (Molinero et al 2002;Feinstein et al 2003;Yoo 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawdown and the lateral extent of this depression depend on the depth of the tunnel below the initial water table and on aquifer hydraulic characteristics. A wide range of methods has been proposed to predict both groundwater inflow to tunnels and the drawdown caused by the tunnel such as analytical solutions for different hydrogeological settings (Goodman et al 1965;Kolymbas and Wagner 2007;Marechal and Perrochet 2003;Perrochet 2005), including solutions for transient flow towards tunnels drilled into heterogeneous formations (Perrochet and Dematteis 2007) or tunnels in multi-layer aquifer systems (Yang and Yeh 2007), as well as different numerical models (Molinero et al 2002;Feinstein et al 2003;Yoo 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the surrounding rock is regarded as the continuous porous medium [18], the impact of cracks evenly spread over the surrounding rock. Because of the uncertainty of the joints, the associated permeability parameters are difficult to obtain by geological exploration, the surrounding rock is assumed as continuous medium which does not fully comply with the actual situation, despite all this, the continuous porous medium seepage theory is relatively mature [19], the rock mass can still be regarded as continuous medium which conforms to Darcy's law in many studies [20]. The analysis in this paper is on the basis of continuous medium, but the surrounding rock is not isotropic medium, such as slate, the hydraulic conductivity along the joint direction is larger than the vertical hydraulic conductivity.…”
Section: The Verification Of Seepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These following assumptions are adopted according to actual engineering in this paper for simplifying [3]:…”
Section: Tunnel Engineering Seepage Parameters Intelligent Back Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the complex variable method, Kolymbas and Wagner [7] used the conformal mapping technique and obtained exact analytical solutions of groundwater ingress into a circular tunnel with deep or shallow buried depth. Considering the different boundary conditions at the tunnel perimeter, constant total hydraulic head and constant water pressure, Park et al [8] and Huangfu et al [9] derived analytical solutions of seepage field for steady water inflow into a drained circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%