2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater potential zone identification at Plio-Pleistocene elevated tract, Bangladesh: AHP-GIS and remote sensing approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MRSA was conducted to determine the most or the least influential thematic layer for groundwater recharge zones [30]. The sensitivity index, S, was computed using Equation 11:…”
Section: Map Removal Sensitivity Analysis (Mrsa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MRSA was conducted to determine the most or the least influential thematic layer for groundwater recharge zones [30]. The sensitivity index, S, was computed using Equation 11:…”
Section: Map Removal Sensitivity Analysis (Mrsa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methods have been implemented for groundwater recharge zone mapping worldwide [24][25][26][27] such as frequency ratio (FR), certainty factor (CF), weights-of-evidence (WOE), fuzzy logic index models, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-influencing factors (MIF). In particular, the AHP and MIF techniques have gained attention as useful approaches for groundwater prediction for rapid, precise and cost-effective assessment of groundwater recharge potential [28][29][30][31][32][33] by significantly reducing the mathematical complexity of decision-making based on systematic expert judgment. AHP is a GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique for pairwise comparison of spatial parameters by assigning weights based on expert opinion [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite numerous methods for exploring groundwater resources, for example, drilling, geological, hydrogeological and geophysical methods [8], the most generally used techniques for investigating groundwater resources are drilled tests and stratigraphic investigation [6,9,30]. These methods require extensive time, money, resources, and expert participation [8,9,[30][31][32]. The usage of GIS and RS is, on the other hand, less expensive, more responsive, and more convenient [8,9,33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of RS and GIS to gather, manipulate, and cover vast amounts of data in a short amount of time makes it a more effective tool for identifying, analyzing, and preserving groundwater resources. As a result, multiple data sources can be incorporated into a GIS platform to build conceptual models for identifying potential groundwater zones in a given area [31,32,37,44,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrated utilization of remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) are being widely used for groundwater prospecting, as remote sensing offers good functionality for mapping the groundwater recharge area, and can differentiate and identify various structures including rocks, vegetation, and water [29]. Moreover, integration of different techniques can solve problems associated with the hidden subsurface heterogeneity and identify different structures like rocks, water, and vegetation [16,[30][31][32]. Potential groundwater zone boundaries include routes and fault zones [33][34][35], rainfall, soil, lithology, and texture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%