“…Linear flow can be interpreted with various models; however, if flow is due to channel structures (e.g., a one‐dimensional open channel within fractures, one‐dimensionally connected fractures, or the intersection of two fractures or faults; Enachescu et al, ; Ferroud et al, ; Tsang & Neretnieks, ), the extent of such flow paths is limited (Ji et al, ; Yabuuchi et al, ). Although linear flow may be caused by one‐dimensional flow toward large faults from surrounding small‐joint systems (i.e., a dual‐porosity model for multiscale fracture networks; Figure c; Jia et al, ; Roques et al, ), this case is limited to crystalline rocks or mechanically layered rocks where joint systems tend to develop, and is unlikely in massive mudstones such as those of the Koetoi, Wakkanai, and Palfris Formations (Eichhubl & Boles, ; Le Garzic et al, ; Odling et al, ). This view is also supported by the observation that joint systems are not common in the Koetoi, Wakkanai, and Palfris Formations, and that flow anomalies (flow paths) are detected almost solely in single shear fractures in the Koetoi Formation and in fault zones of the Wakkanai and Palfris Formations (Ishii, ; Mazurek et al, ).…”