2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater suitability analysis for drinking using GIS based fuzzy logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the ability of the fuzzy method to reduce uncertainties and its other advantages, some other researchers have tried to combine or compare the traditional methods with the fuzzy inference system so that a group of researchers have used both the drinking water quality index and the fuzzy inference system to compare or combine the results and have better and acceptable results. They have achieved more than the previous obedience [20][21][22][23][24][25]5].…”
Section: Introdoctionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Due to the ability of the fuzzy method to reduce uncertainties and its other advantages, some other researchers have tried to combine or compare the traditional methods with the fuzzy inference system so that a group of researchers have used both the drinking water quality index and the fuzzy inference system to compare or combine the results and have better and acceptable results. They have achieved more than the previous obedience [20][21][22][23][24][25]5].…”
Section: Introdoctionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…After generating the fuzzy membership functions, the fuzzy overlay analysis is performed using ArcMap 10.8. Recent studies have utilized fuzzy overlay analysis for different applications (Hasanloo et al,2019;Mallik et al, 2021). Using the fuzzy overlay tool in ArcMap, a multicriteria overlay analysis can examine the likelihood that a phenomenon belongs to many sets.…”
Section: Flood Exposure Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of OK models, the study utilized the crossvalidation technique, considering predictive errors such as mean error (ME), root mean square error (RMSE), mean standardized error (MSE), root mean square standardized error (RMSSE), and average standard error (ASE). Model selection was determined based on the following criteria: the lowest ME and MSE (approaching zero), identical RMSE and ASE values, and an RMSSE value close to one, indicating the most suitable model (Mallik et al, 2020;Sebei et al, 2020). These errors' mathematical expressions are as follows (Eqs 2-4):…”
Section: Kriging Interpolation For Studied Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%