2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c03623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group 11 m-Terphenyl Complexes Featuring Metallophilic Interactions

Abstract: A series of group 11 m-terphenyl complexes have been synthesized via a metathesis reaction from the iron(II) complexes (2,6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The longer Cu–S bond lengths in 1 and 2 are consistent with the increased bulkiness of the ligands . The Cu--Cu distances in complexes 1 and 2 are 2.452(2) Å and 2.410(7) Å, respectively, which are greater than the sum of the covalent radii (2.24 Å) of the two Cu atoms, which does not establish metal–metal bonding, but are within the sum of the van der Waals radii (2.8 Å), suggesting the presence of a correlation-dispersion interaction. Additionally, the Cu--Cu distances in both complexes are comparable to those in some previously reported copper­(I) complexes, , and these Cu--Cu distances, in conjunction with computational studies, , concluded that the Cu--Cu separations in 1 and 2 do not indicate the presence of Cu–Cu bonds. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the Cu--Cu distance of 2 is slightly longer than that of 1 , which produces higher dispersion energy due to the increased numbers of isopropyl groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The longer Cu–S bond lengths in 1 and 2 are consistent with the increased bulkiness of the ligands . The Cu--Cu distances in complexes 1 and 2 are 2.452(2) Å and 2.410(7) Å, respectively, which are greater than the sum of the covalent radii (2.24 Å) of the two Cu atoms, which does not establish metal–metal bonding, but are within the sum of the van der Waals radii (2.8 Å), suggesting the presence of a correlation-dispersion interaction. Additionally, the Cu--Cu distances in both complexes are comparable to those in some previously reported copper­(I) complexes, , and these Cu--Cu distances, in conjunction with computational studies, , concluded that the Cu--Cu separations in 1 and 2 do not indicate the presence of Cu–Cu bonds. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the Cu--Cu distance of 2 is slightly longer than that of 1 , which produces higher dispersion energy due to the increased numbers of isopropyl groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The ligand–metal delocalization indices fit well with other reported metal–ligand delocalization indices. For example, in dimeric copper and silver m -terphenyl complexes with comparable metal coordination geometries and short metal–metal distances, the delocalization indices between each metal and the bridging carbon atom of the m -terphenyl ligand were found to be in the range 0.51–0.61 . For the bridged C 2v isomer of Co 2 (CO) 8 , the delocalization indices between the cobalt centers and the bridging CO were found to have an average value of around 0.82 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the aromaticity of the mesityl ligand is disrupted by metal coordination and the complexes retain their dimeric structures in solution. In contrast to the silver m-terphenyl complex [(2,6-Mes 2 C 6 H 3 )Ag] 2 , 13 only broad, unresolved 1 J CAg splitting patterns were observed for the Z 2 -bound carbon atoms in [2-Ag] 2 . More conclusive evidence that complexes [2-Cu] 2 and [2-Ag] 2 remain dimeric in solution was provided by diffusion-ordered spectroscopy (DOSY) measurements in benzene solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…To classify the coordination environment of the metal ions in the dimers, we performed the same NBO analysis on the isostructural m-terphenyl complexes published by Kays. 13 As for the metallophilic interactions, the complexes have slightly higher WBIs: 0.261 for [(2,6-Mes 2 C 6 H 3 )Cu] 2 and 0.398 for [(2,6-Mes 2 C 6 H 3 )Ag] 2 . The gold derivative has an AuÁ Á ÁAu bond order of 0.291 and thus, unlike for the nitrogen-bonded complexes, does not exhibit the strongest metal-metal interaction in the series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation