“…The longer Cu–S bond lengths in 1 and 2 are consistent with the increased bulkiness of the ligands . The Cu--Cu distances in complexes 1 and 2 are 2.452(2) Å and 2.410(7) Å, respectively, which are greater than the sum of the covalent radii (2.24 Å) of the two Cu atoms, which does not establish metal–metal bonding, but are within the sum of the van der Waals radii (2.8 Å), suggesting the presence of a correlation-dispersion interaction. − Additionally, the Cu--Cu distances in both complexes are comparable to those in some previously reported copper(I) complexes, , and these Cu--Cu distances, in conjunction with computational studies, , concluded that the Cu--Cu separations in 1 and 2 do not indicate the presence of Cu–Cu bonds. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the Cu--Cu distance of 2 is slightly longer than that of 1 , which produces higher dispersion energy due to the increased numbers of isopropyl groups.…”