Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry II 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b0-08-043748-6/02024-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group 1s and 2s Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 724 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cesium shows a less defined coordination by additional π-coordinative interactions, which is also typical for the heavier alkali metals. [39] Also typical for the alkali metals is that the crystal water content in the isolated products decreased in the direction Li Ǟ Cs, which can be attributed to the fact that ionic binding becomes more and more relevant in the same direction. Regarding the coordination of the Me 2 Violigand, κ 2 O,OЈ-and κ 2 N,OЈ-chelating modes, which have been frequently seen also with other metals, turned out to be the most favored coordination patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cesium shows a less defined coordination by additional π-coordinative interactions, which is also typical for the heavier alkali metals. [39] Also typical for the alkali metals is that the crystal water content in the isolated products decreased in the direction Li Ǟ Cs, which can be attributed to the fact that ionic binding becomes more and more relevant in the same direction. Regarding the coordination of the Me 2 Violigand, κ 2 O,OЈ-and κ 2 N,OЈ-chelating modes, which have been frequently seen also with other metals, turned out to be the most favored coordination patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The substituent effect seems to be actually more pronounced than the impact of metal‐ion radius and coordinated solvent, as very similar M 2 (DAD) core structures have been observed for different alkali metals and donor solvents. Therefore, the increased affinity to π‐coordinating ligands which is typical for the heavier alkali metals K, Rb and Cs was not apparent in the M 2 (DAD) core structures of the potassium derivatives 5 and 8 . However, additional intermolecular aryl‐π coordination is important for coordinative saturation of the metal centers in 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, this interaction has received considerable attention, with several investigators noting that heavier alkaline earth metals have a preference for the formation of multiple M-Cp bonds over a single M-co-ligand bond. 24,27,88,110,111,136 The rationale for the preferential formation of several weaker secondary interactions over fewer, but stronger, primary interactions would be that the summation of the secondary interactions provides greater stabilization than a single metal-co-ligand interaction. As such, these are strongly metal-dependent, with the larger, heavier alkaline earth metals showing an apparent preference for M-Cp interactions.…”
Section: Studies Confirming the Significance Of M-cpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last several years, the array of heavy organoalkaline earth metal compounds has multiplied, as summarized in several recent review articles. [24][25][26][27][28][29] In line with the focus of this article, a few of the recent contributions are chosen to illustrate aspects of synthetic methodology and secondary interactions. .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%