2009
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/26/23/235003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group averaging for de Sitter free fields

Abstract: Perturbative gravity about global de Sitter space is subject to linearizationstability constraints. Such constraints imply that quantum states of matter fields couple consistently to gravity only if the matter state has vanishing de Sitter charges; i.e., only if the state is invariant under the symmetries of de Sitter space. As noted by Higuchi, the usual Fock spaces for matter fields contain no de Sitter-invariant states except the vacuum, though a new Hilbert space of de Sitter invariant states can be constr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We should also comment on the apparent conflict of our result with the pro-invariance argument given by Marolf and Morrison [63], based on work by Higuchi [64]. They dealt with free dynamical gravitons in a noncovariant gauge on the full de Sitter manifold and they were able to construct the complete panoply of mode solutions and inner products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We should also comment on the apparent conflict of our result with the pro-invariance argument given by Marolf and Morrison [63], based on work by Higuchi [64]. They dealt with free dynamical gravitons in a noncovariant gauge on the full de Sitter manifold and they were able to construct the complete panoply of mode solutions and inner products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, as already pointed out, thanks to the mathematical structure of the formulation we are using, inspired by the ambient space approach, it can be checked quite easily that the aforementioned break down in the normalization factor is because of a degeneracy for L = 0 mode reflecting the gauge-like symmetry (2). This point explicitly reveals that, quite contrary to the authors claim in [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], such a construction in the STT gauge conditions (L ≥ 2), by ignoring the L = 0 mode and consequently the gauge-like symmetry (2) reflected by it, does not transform correctly under the whole symmetries of the classical theory, and therefore, even obtaining an infrared free graviton twopoint function in this way is not physically significant since it is not covariant anyway. To see other criticism to this method, one can refer to [51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Graviton Two-point Functionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Take a closer look at the method which has been utilized in Refs. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] shows that the authors have considered the synchronous-transversetraceless (STT) gauge to evaluate the graviton two-point function. The critical point associated with this method is that it is not possible to find a dS graviton field satisfying the STT gauge conditions if L = 0 or 1 [47].…”
Section: Graviton Two-point Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23]). The simplicity of group averaging for the present model is in part due working in low dimensions, but has more to do with the presence of conformal symmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More formal discussions of group averaging can be found in [20,21]. Other studies of de Sitter group averaging include [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%