2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group-aware Label Transfer for Domain Adaptive Person Re-identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, our PDL only one encoder used is compared with the MMT [14] method that uses the two-stream network, showing a noticeable 6.4% and 14.9% improvements in terms of mAP on Market-to-Duke and Duke-to-Market respectively. Compared to the state-ofthe-art method GLT [41] which is based on label transfer, our method leads to 2.3% mAP and 4.4% mAP gain on Marketto-Duke and Duke-to-Market respectively. The results verify the effectiveness of our method.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Meanwhile, our PDL only one encoder used is compared with the MMT [14] method that uses the two-stream network, showing a noticeable 6.4% and 14.9% improvements in terms of mAP on Market-to-Duke and Duke-to-Market respectively. Compared to the state-ofthe-art method GLT [41] which is based on label transfer, our method leads to 2.3% mAP and 4.4% mAP gain on Marketto-Duke and Duke-to-Market respectively. The results verify the effectiveness of our method.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thirdly, DCC has better generalization capabilities, e.g., DCC achieves the better performance for both supervised and unsupervised person ReID on two datasets. SSG [16] 58.3 80.0 90.0 92.4 UGA [42] 70.3 87.2 --NRMT [48] 71.7 87.8 94.6 96.5 JVTC+ [4] 75.4 90.5 96.2 97.1 MMT [17] 75.6 89.3 95.8 97.5 SPCL [18] 77.5 89.7 96.1 97.6 ICE [3] 79.2 92.0 97.0 98.1 GLT [54] 79.5 92.2 96.5 97.8 FastReID [20] 80.5 92.7 --CACAL [30] 80.9 92.7 97.4 98.5 CC(ResNet50) [13] 82.6 93.0 97.0 98.1 CC(ResNet50-ibn) [13] 84…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Liu et al [32] use three GAN models to reduce the discrepancy between different domains in illumination, resolution, and camera-view, respectively. To handle the lack of annotation, many methods have been proposed to acquire reliable pseudo labels [15,31,46,47,54]. For example, Lin et al [31] propose a bottom-up unsupervised clustering method that simultaneously considers both diversity and similarity.…”
Section: Unsupervised Person Re-identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A memory based generalization loss and a meta batch normalization layer was also added to diversify the advantages of meta-learning. In [257] a Group-aware label transfer algorithm was proposed. It promotes the pseudo-labels via online interaction.…”
Section: Cnn-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%