2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.86.067102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group chase and escape with some fast chasers

Abstract: We study group chase and escape with some fast chasers. In our model chasers look for the nearest target and move to one of the nearest sites in order to catch the target. On the other hand, targets try to escape from the nearest chaser. When a chaser catches a target, the target is removed from the system and the number of targets decreases. The lifetime of targets, at which all targets caught, decreases as t α with increasing the number of chasers. When there are no fast chasers and the total number of chase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of information gathering can be non-reciprocal and long-ranged, far beyond the range of standard colloidal interactions [43,44]. Various lattice [45][46][47] and off-lattice [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] approaches have been employed in simulations and analytical theory to elucidate the emerging properties in systems of cognitive and self-steering objects. Such studies often focus on hunting and predator-prey systems, and consider optimal predation strategies [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of information gathering can be non-reciprocal and long-ranged, far beyond the range of standard colloidal interactions [43,44]. Various lattice [45][46][47] and off-lattice [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] approaches have been employed in simulations and analytical theory to elucidate the emerging properties in systems of cognitive and self-steering objects. Such studies often focus on hunting and predator-prey systems, and consider optimal predation strategies [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied the predator-prey dynamics of a single predator hunting a herd of prey on a square lattice with decision-making species. While many predator-prey models deal with collective predation [28,29,30,31,32] or the search for the optimal number of predators given the number of prey [33], we chose a model consisting of one predator and many prey, which is often found in Nature. Solitary hunters such as tigers, bears, or sea turtles often have herd animals as their target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many modified versions of the group chase and escape model were proposed. The literatures contain a large body of work on how to enhance the catching efficiency, such as adding interaction among pursuers (keep enough space among pursuers) (Saito et al, 2016), adding lazy or fast pursuers (Iwama and Sato, 2012;Masuko et al, 2017), and using a collective chasing strategy (Janosov et al, 2017). The literatures also contain the study of aggregation in group chase and escape.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pursuit-evasion phenomena is widely observed in nature, an example of which is the interaction between coyotes, elk and wolves in Yellowstone National Park (Ripple and Larsen, 2000;Gese, 2001). Studying this phenomena provides an insight into natural interactions, such as prey escape strategies (Breakwell, 1975;Bhattacharya et al, 2011Bhattacharya et al, , 2014Yang et al, 2014;Zha et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019), collective behavior (Neill and Cullen, 1974;Siegfried and Underhill, 1975;Bertram, 1978), catching efficiency for predators (Iwama and Sato, 2012;Saito et al, 2016;Masuko et al, 2017;Janosov et al, 2017) and the optimal number of predators for predation success (Kamimura and Ohira, 2010;Vicsek, 2010). But this approach can also provide elegant solutions for artificial systems, including the design of target trapping by autonomous robots (Antonelli et al, 2007;Huang et al, 2013;Peng et al, 2016;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%