1975
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690210607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group‐contribution estimation of activity coefficients in nonideal liquid mixtures

Abstract: and Pratt (1933) contained lower values of holdup (most values were < 10 % ) , and V, was shown to be more nearly constant. At low values of holdup, there is little difference between V, and V,. Generally, V, is believed to be a more useful correlating parameter over a wide range of holdup values. However, neither of the parameters is as accurate as one may desire, and improved correlations, especially those with a theoretical basis, are needed. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was sponsored by the U.S. Atomic Energy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
2,048
0
65

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,068 publications
(2,125 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
12
2,048
0
65
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, solid-liquid equilibrium data on two fatty mixtures, triolein + 1-octadecanol and triolein + 1-hexadecanol, were measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), evaluated with optical microscopy and modeled by resolution of the thermodynamic equilibrium equations using the twoand three-suffix Margules equations, the original UNIFAC (Fredenslund et al, 1975) and the modified UNIFAC-Dortmund model (Gmehling et al, 1993) for calculation of the liquid-phase activity coefficient. An optimization algorithm was implemented in MATLAB for prediction of the melting point.…”
Section: Brazilian Journal Of Chemical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present work, solid-liquid equilibrium data on two fatty mixtures, triolein + 1-octadecanol and triolein + 1-hexadecanol, were measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), evaluated with optical microscopy and modeled by resolution of the thermodynamic equilibrium equations using the twoand three-suffix Margules equations, the original UNIFAC (Fredenslund et al, 1975) and the modified UNIFAC-Dortmund model (Gmehling et al, 1993) for calculation of the liquid-phase activity coefficient. An optimization algorithm was implemented in MATLAB for prediction of the melting point.…”
Section: Brazilian Journal Of Chemical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the UNIFAC model (Equations (6) to (17)) (Fredenslund et al, 1975), the activity coefficient can be written as the sum of a combinatorial contribution C i γ , which accounts for the effects of size and shape, and a residual contribution R i γ , which accounts for interactions among groups. and Q k are the structural parameters for the groups and a nm is the temperature-dependent groupinteraction parameter (Reid et al, 1987).…”
Section: Thermodynamic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The group contribution method UNIFAC and the COSMO-based models are Gibbs excess free energy (G E ) models, which allow the prediction of liquidphase activity coefficients i γ as a function of temperature and composition (Fredenslund et al, 1975). In both families of models the activity coefficient is calculated as the sum of a combinatorial and a residual part:…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a model f or the activity coefficients calculations can be carried out to obtain liquid-liquid compositions (Sørensen et al, 1979b). Two models were used in our calculations: UNIQUAC (Abrams and Prausnitz, 1975) and UNIFAC (Fredenslund et al, 1975). The data, equations, parameters and programs were taken from Sørensen and Arlt (1980) and Magnussen et al (1981).…”
Section: Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%