1996
DOI: 10.21236/ada314812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Contribution to Molar Refraction and Refractive Index of Conjugated Polymers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10]20 In this study, to achieve cross-linked thin films with high RI from sCVD, DVB was chosen as a comonomer because aromatic groups are characterized by high molar refractions and relatively compact molar volumes. 21 Furthermore, theoretical functionality (f) of DVB in the copolymerization with elemental sulfur is 6, because in addition to the two olefins, the benzylic radicals, formed from the abstraction of benzylic hydrogen atoms from DVB units by electrophilic sulfur radicals, can further react with sulfur to form C−S bonds. 22 Such a high accessible functionality value means that the DVB monomer can accommodate large amount of sulfur, which is desirable for SCPs with high sulfur content.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10]20 In this study, to achieve cross-linked thin films with high RI from sCVD, DVB was chosen as a comonomer because aromatic groups are characterized by high molar refractions and relatively compact molar volumes. 21 Furthermore, theoretical functionality (f) of DVB in the copolymerization with elemental sulfur is 6, because in addition to the two olefins, the benzylic radicals, formed from the abstraction of benzylic hydrogen atoms from DVB units by electrophilic sulfur radicals, can further react with sulfur to form C−S bonds. 22 Such a high accessible functionality value means that the DVB monomer can accommodate large amount of sulfur, which is desirable for SCPs with high sulfur content.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For accurate predictions of the refractive index of hypothetical bulk polymers, calculations are typically made using the molar refractivity of specific functional groups (e.g., methylene, aromatic, and thioether), for which extensive tables exist. 24 The molar refractivity values of these functional groups are summed to generate the repeat unit of the polymer from which the refractive index of the bulk polymer can be estimated 24,26…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39] The values of the refractive index n were found systematically lower for the developed thin films (n = 1.61 at 650 nm for instance) compared to those determined before development (n = 1.80 at 650 nm) (see ESI - Figure S5a). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 15 the fact that photopolymerized layers loose compactness and gain free volume after development.…”
Section: Impact Of Photocrosslinking On the Density And Emission Propmentioning
confidence: 88%