Group Counseling with Navy Prisoners

Biasco, Frank; Redfering, David L.

doi:10.1080/15496295.1980.11728591

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1981

2002

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For these reasons, the present review reports a series of univariate meta-analyses, rather than a single, multivariate meta-analysis. Andrews & Young (1974) Older participants 12 9 0.45 Andrews & Young (1974) Younger participants 12 14 0.64 Biasco & Redfering (1980) 10 10 0.90 Davis et al (1976)…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group psychotherapy with incarcerated offenders: A research synthesis.

Morgan

Flora

2002

Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group psychotherapy with incarcerated offenders: A research synthesis.

Morgan

Flora

2002

Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Group Psychotherapy Literature: 1980

Lubin

et al. 1981

International Journal of Group Psychotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regrouping the categorization of group work a goals and process (GAP) matrix for groups

Waldo

Bauman

1998

The Journal for Specialists in Group Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The four group work categories &veloped by thehsociation for Specialists in GroupWork have been usefil in organizing intenrentions and establishing training standards. The categories are problematic, howeuel; in that the goal and process dimensions of group work are combined within each category. Rigid fusion of goal and process makes it difficult to categorize the many groups that pursue goals from one category through aprocess associated with another: A new model fbr the classification of group work is proposed, which separates goals and process dimensions, forming a matrix that allows for more accurate categorization of group types.

show abstract

Group Counseling with Navy Prisoners

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Group psychotherapy with incarcerated offenders: A research synthesis.

Group psychotherapy with incarcerated offenders: A research synthesis.

The Group Psychotherapy Literature: 1980

Regrouping the categorization of group work a goals and process (GAP) matrix for groups

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About