International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icsea.2007.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Decision-Making Processes in Industrial Software Evolution

Abstract: Software evolution decision-making is important. Decisions can be made by an individual or a group.Currently it is not known how decision-making is organized in software industry. However, that knowledge is needed to improve the decision-making processes. Therefore, we have studied 29 decisionmaking experts, who were involved in software evolution decision-making. The study was performed with qualitative methods, which enabled the gathering of versatile information concerning the views of the decision-makers. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision process that SDLC teams follow is similar to their development process as prior research concludes that SDLC teams use a rational decision-making (RDM) model for requirements engineering decision-making 14 and for software evolution projects 15 . RDM models assume decision-makers are fully informed 16,17 and define decision-making as an optimal way of choosing between a number of alternatives 18 , often in a linear, sequential manner 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The decision process that SDLC teams follow is similar to their development process as prior research concludes that SDLC teams use a rational decision-making (RDM) model for requirements engineering decision-making 14 and for software evolution projects 15 . RDM models assume decision-makers are fully informed 16,17 and define decision-making as an optimal way of choosing between a number of alternatives 18 , often in a linear, sequential manner 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similar to the rational decision process 30 outlined above, Mintzberg's 20 first phase, the Problem Identification phase, identifies the problem via two steps: decision recognition, which identifies opportunities and problems evoking decision activity; and diagnosis, where decision-makers try to make sense of the opportunities and problems to understand the decision situation and its cause-effect relationships 20,31 .…”
Section: Decision-making Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations