GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2020
DOI: 10.1109/globecom42002.2020.9348241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group-Delay Aware Task Offloading with Service Replication for Scalable Mobile Edge Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these strategies lengthen the overall VM transmission delay, which also lowers the user QoE. The authors in [21] have provided some approaches for VMs to ensure high reliability to minimize the difficulties of service replication. This method necessitates constant error detection, and it is recoverable by shifting to an available instance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these strategies lengthen the overall VM transmission delay, which also lowers the user QoE. The authors in [21] have provided some approaches for VMs to ensure high reliability to minimize the difficulties of service replication. This method necessitates constant error detection, and it is recoverable by shifting to an available instance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cope with task processing delay, energy consumption, and monetary cost, it aimed for reducing the cost of resource utilization for a certain system capability. [18] provided a group‐delay aware task offloading and service replication scheme. Given with the buffer size, channel quality and transmission distance between MEC servers, it minimizes the service delay of all users while satisfying the application‐specific delay requirements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before assessing the relative performance of DQTM, we fine tune the weighting parameters of DQTM, that is the learning rate and batch size in the mini-batch gradient descent. After that, DQTM is compared with the local, random allocation, and minimized average service time schemes, which are respectively termed as local, random and MAST [18] for brevity. The local scheme disables any task migration, which is used as a comparison baseline to highlight the effect by task migration.…”
Section: Simulation Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation