2017
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Differences in Student Performance in the Selection to Higher Education: Tests vs Grades

Abstract: Student selection in the Swedish admission to higher education system is based on two fundamentally different performance measures: their criterion-referenced upper secondary grade point average (GPA) and their score on a norm-referenced and multiple-choice admissions test [Swedish admissions test (SweSAT)]. Several student characteristics are known to affect rankings in such assessments. The objectives of this study are to assess main and interactive effects of several variables that influence rankings obtain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results generally show that school grades have higher predictive value than the admission tests (Lyrén, 2008;Wolming and Wikström, 2010). According to Wikström & Wikström (2017), "These findings are consistent with international observations that academic performance is more strongly correlated with school grades than with admissions' test scores" (p.2). The general conclusion from these studies is that the two types of measurements predict differently because in essence, they measure different attributes.…”
Section: Admission Testssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results generally show that school grades have higher predictive value than the admission tests (Lyrén, 2008;Wolming and Wikström, 2010). According to Wikström & Wikström (2017), "These findings are consistent with international observations that academic performance is more strongly correlated with school grades than with admissions' test scores" (p.2). The general conclusion from these studies is that the two types of measurements predict differently because in essence, they measure different attributes.…”
Section: Admission Testssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Selection tests introduce rigor in the selection process and are used in situations where available spaces fall short of the demand or where certain aptitudes are required. In such situations, the quality of entrants is carefully considered because it has implications for the educational institution, the individual student and the wider society (Wikström & Wikström 2017). Similarly, the fairness of the selection instrument is carefully considered because the inherent qualities of the instrument can either favor or disadvantage groups of people to be selected which can have implications for social ideology (Wolming, 2001).…”
Section: Admission Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jansen and Suhre (2015) chose to collect annual survey data on student motivation, perceptions of the instructional environment, participation in courses, and enrollment in course scores as indicators of the characteristics of the graduate experience. Among these predictors, we focus on college entrance examination scores (known as "Gaokao" score), because the honors program was developed specifically for the most capable students, and in China, high school entrance exam scores are an important indicator of general academic ability and educational outcomes (Wang et al, 2022), which differs from the student selection in the Swedish admission to higher education system which is based on two fundamentally different performance measures (Wikström and Wikström, 2017). Educators primarily perceive and achieve assessment quality through traditional criteria (Schellekens et al, 2023).…”
Section: Academic Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%